Case Summary
The plaintiff, Harish Kumar Pranlal, is in a dispute with his son, daughter-in-law, and grandson regarding his right to possess his property. The case involves threats from the defendants to dispossess the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A decree of permanent property injunction is passed restraining the defendants from forcefully entering into the plaint schedule property and from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows. (a) A decree of permanent property injunction is passed restraining the defendants from forcefully entering into the plaint schedule property, residing there and from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Harish Kumar Pranlal (79 years years)
5C, Indradhanus Apartments, T.D Road, Ernakulam – 682 035
Defendants
Amit Chhabani (48 years years)
Flat No.A1, Bhanus Enclave, Vallarpadam-Panabukad Road, Vallarpadam - 682 504
Parul Madhavani (46 years years)
Calcutta Building, T.D East Road, Mattancherry - 682 002
Yog Chhabani (21 years years)
Calcutta Building, T.D East Road, Mattancherry - 682 002
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Permanent injunction restraining the defendants from forcefully entering into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent property injunction is passed restraining the defendants from forcefully entering into the plaint schedule property, residing there and from dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Permanent injunction restraining the defendants from doing acts detrimental to the plaintiff's peaceful possession.
Evidence:
A decree of permanent property injunction is passed restraining the defendants from doing any act, which is detrimental to the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Parties to suffer respective costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates ownership of the plaint schedule property by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Death Certificate
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides proof of the death of the plaintiff's wife, impacting possession claims.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that the plaintiff is paying taxes for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Presented evidence relevant to the court's decision.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Photographs
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Supporting evidence for the plaintiff's claims, subject to proof.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)