Case Summary
This case involves a dispute over the partition of property originally belonging to Mr. P.G. Muraleedharan. The plaintiff Jayanthilal P.M. and the defendants, who are his relatives, seek a formal division of their inherited property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit for partition, admitting that the defendants consent to the distribution of shares among the plaintiffs and defendants. The property will be divided equally as per the agreed shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted to the relationship and the share distribution during the proceedings, leading to a consensus on partition.
The defendants admitted to the relationship and the share distribution during the proceedings, leading to a consensus on partition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants admitted to the relationship and the share distribution during the proceedings, leading to a consensus on partition.
The defendants admitted to the relationship and the share distribution during the proceedings, leading to a consensus on partition.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the said admission of the defendants in their pleadings, this court is of the opinion that no other issue is left for determination in this suit.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed on admission of the defendants. Let the plaint schedule properties be partitioned among the 2nd and 3rd plaintiffs, first and second defendants, to the suit by metes and bounds.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jayanthilal P.M.
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Manju N.N.
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o. Late Jayathilal
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anjali Jayanthilal
- Party Age
- 22
- Relation
- D/o. Late Jayanthilal
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jainy Suresh
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o P.T. Suresh
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Renjini Sabu
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o. Sabu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- B. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amal Jose
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Visal Ajayan V.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs granted partition of the plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit be decreed on the admission of the defendants, to partition the plaint schedule property, as provided under O. XII R. 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
Case between Jayanthilal P.M. et al vs Jainy Suresh et al regarding partition of property
Case Code Year
Case between Jayanthilal P.M. et al vs Jainy Suresh et al regarding partition of property