Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1158 /2013

Case between Rejitha Mol R., Renjitha Mol R. vs Renjith Kumar M.R, Geetha Reghunath regarding partition

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-29
Duration
approximately-17 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Rejitha Mol R. and Renjitha Mol R., are the daughters of M.A. Raghunath, while the defendants are Renjith Kumar M.R, the son, and Geetha Reghunath, the wife. The case revolves around the partition of property belonging to their deceased father and allegations of misleading conduct by the first defendant regarding the execution of a partition deed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit stating that the plaintiffs did not prove their claims regarding partition. It found that a prior partition deed was acknowledged and not challenged by the plaintiffs, thus rendering their claim invalid.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs failed to provide evidence to support their claims regarding the partition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Rejitha Mol R. (32 years years) Kattiparambil, Iymanam, Kottayam District. Renjitha Mol R. (29 years years) Puthuparambil Cheruvathoor P.O, Kothamangalam, Ernakulam District.

Defendants

Renjith Kumar M.R (27 years years) XVII/231, Near Janatha Clinic, Veliparambil Mythri Nagar, Vaikom Road, Thekkumbhagam, Tripunithura. Geetha Reghunath (57 years years) XVII/231, Near Janatha Clinic, Veliparmbil Mythri Nagar, Vaikom Road, Thekkumbhagam, Tripunithura.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiffs requested partition of the property.
Evidence:
Since the plaint schedule property was already partitioned, the plaint schedule property is not partiable. Therefore the plaintiffs have no right as of their own to claim partition of the property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court references the partition deed to determine the entitlement of the plaintiffs and defendants regarding the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
deed No 3361/2008 of Ernakulam SRO

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 02/01/2007 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases