Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 184/2019

Case between Nandhan @ Nandakumar vs Sunitha Santhosh et al regarding Suit for permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-07-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nandhan @ Nandakumar is the plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction against Sunitha Santhosh and others regarding a pathway that he claims to have used continuously for over 12 years. The defendants argue that the plaintiff has no legal right over the pathway and that they are the true owners of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed O.S. 184/2019, finding that the plaintiff failed to prove his right over the claimed pathway. O.S. 964/2019 and O.S. 1295/2019 were decided in favor of the respective plaintiffs seeking fixation of boundaries and injunctions against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish any legal right or easement over the disputed pathway.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the O.S.184/2019 is dismissed. O.S.964/2019 is decreed as follows, restraining the defendants from trespassing upon the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Nandhan @ Nandakumar (52 years years) Thachanatt house, South Chittoor P.O, Cheranelloor village, Kanayannoor taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 027

Defendants

Sunitha Santhosh (45 years years) Padmalayam house, South Chittoor P.O, Pin – 682 027, Cheranelloor village, Kanayannor taluk, Ernakulam District Sudha Suthan (58 years years) Thachanatt house, South chittoor P.O, Cheranelloor village, Kanayannoor taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 027 Santhosh Kumar (53 years years) Padmalayam house, South Chittoor, Cheranelloor village, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 027

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The plaintiff sought a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from trespassing and demolishing boundary walls.
Evidence:
The plaintiff has failed to prove a right of easement by implied grant over plaint B schedule pathway.
Relief Type: Fixation of Boundary
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought decree for fixation of the boundaries regarding the plaintiff’s property.
Evidence:
Accordingly, issue No.3 in O.S.964/2019 is found in favour of the plaintiffs therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Release deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Established the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Encumbrance certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided evidence regarding the property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Application for Measurement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrated the plaintiff's efforts to establish property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed interaction with the Kanayannur taluk office regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Verified the property tax payments by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Verified additional property tax payments.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Patta Purchase Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provided historical background of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Established the defendants' ownership of the contested property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further evidence of property transactions by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Continued documentation of transactions related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Additional evidence of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further evidence of the defendants' property holdings.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Clarified ownership documentation of the property.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Confirmed the defendants' tax payments for property.
Reference:
Ext.B7
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Provided evidence related to defendants' claims.
Reference:
Ext.B8
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Further evidence of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B9
Document Type: Document
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Additional verification of ownership by defendants.
Reference:
Ext.B10
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided findings regarding the property layout and boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provided further evidence regarding property verification.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation of the disputed property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C3

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam, Kerala
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases