Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1406 / 2019

Case between Maneesh Sasidharan vs Daimler Financial Services India Pvt Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-23
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Maneesh Sasidharan, the managing partner of Salabham Travels, filed a suit against Daimler Financial Services India Pvt Ltd. and others for permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent illegal repossession of a vehicle. The plaintiff alleges intimidation and coercion during a loan transaction for the vehicle, fearing unlawful repossession attempts.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the first defendant from repossessing the vehicle without due legal process. Additionally, costs of the suit were to be paid to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against repossessing the vehicle.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established his case through unchallenged oral and documentary evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed on the following terms. 1) 1st defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from repossessing the vehicle bearing Reg. No.PY 05 F 9037 without the due process of law.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Maneesh Sasidharan (39 years) Meledom Building, Ambadimala, Chottanikkara, Ernakulam – 682312

Defendants

Daimler Financial Services India Pvt Ltd. (Age not specified years) RMZ Millennia Business Park, Campus 3B, Unit 201, 43, Dr. M G R Road, Perungudi, Chennai- 600096. M M Enterprises (Age not specified years) 68, 2nd Cross OB Halli, M S Nagar Post, Bangalore 560033.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff prayed for an injunction to restrain the defendants from repossessing the vehicle without due process.
Evidence:
1st defendant is restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from repossessing the vehicle bearing Reg. No.PY 05 F 9037 without the due process of law.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the first defendant to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
1st defendant is directed to pay costs of the suit to plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notarized copy of registration certificate of the suit vehicle, establishing the plaintiff's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 09/27/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases