Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 259 OF 2019

Case between Ismail P. vs Muhammed P regarding Injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Sri. JANKISH NARAYANAN
Order Date
2019-11-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case between Ismail P. and Muhammed P., brothers, about a property dispute involving a house where defendant residing after plaintiff withdrew permission.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff entitled to Injunction. Defendant ordered to vacate the house within 3 months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff proved ownership of property and defendant's lack of right; Defendant remained ex-parte.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiff entitled to Mandatory and Perpetual Injunctions. Defendant to vacate house within 3 months and refrain from interfering with the property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Ismail P. (40 Years years) Parayil House, Thekkan Kuttur amsom, Aravanchery desom, PO. Thekkan Kuttur, Tirur Taluk, 676 551 Fathima Shahadiya K.P. (31 Years years)

Defendants

Muhammed P (56 Years years) Thekkan Kuttur amsom, Aravanchery desom, PO. Thekkan Kuttur, Tirur Taluk, 676 551

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant and his family to vacate house in schedule property
Evidence:
The plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence
Relief Type: Perpetual Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant restrained from committing waste in property
Evidence:
The plaintiff has proved his case by adducing cogent and reliable evidence
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize costs from defendant
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff adduced evidence in line with the averments
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court used the report for its decision
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Unknown
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases