Similar Cases
Based on: OS. No. 807/2024 — Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.448/2020
Case between Sajeevan.C. vs District Collector, Kollam et al regarding Declaration and Injunction.
This suit is filed by the plaintiff under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for Declaration and Injunction. The court rejected the plaint due to non-remittance of the Balance Court Fee.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
RP.No. 270/2024 in OS.No.447/2023
Case between Haridasan Potty vs Vedikunnu Bala Ganapathi Temple et al regarding setting aside an order
Haridasan Potty, the petitioner, filed a petition to set aside an order dated 05/11/2024 regarding a suit. The petition was dismissed for default as the petitioner was not represented in court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 259/2017
Case between Sree Mulankadakom Devi Temple Trust Administrative Committee vs Baburaj regarding realisation of money.
The plaintiff, represented by the Trust President, filed a suit for the realization of money against the defendant, Baburaj. Both parties were absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 1010/2022
Case between Vanchippuzhakkavu et al vs Krishnakumar et al regarding setting aside ex-parte decree.
The case involves the petitioners/defendants seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree passed against them. The suit addresses a dispute regarding a temple's management and the plaintiffs' right to perform certain activities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.612/2019
Case between Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity et al vs Priya Somarajan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, including Perumkulam Thiruvalluvanthara Sree Mahavishnu Deity and others, filed a suit against defendant Priya Somarajan for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and no evidence was presented.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 827/2016
Case between Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram et al vs Renjith et al regarding management of temple affairs.
This case involves a dispute over the management of Pezhumthuruth Ottaplavila Sree Bhadra Devi Kshethram between the petitioners, who claim to represent the temple's management committee, and the defendants, who assert their prior authority. The plaintiffs seek a declaration of their rights and an injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 704/2018
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Ansad and Nabeesath, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jameela Beevi and Nadirsha, to prevent them from interfering with a pathway they have been using for access to their properties. The defendants deny the existence of the pathway and claim it belongs solely to them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 910/2016
Case between Sajai Kumar.A.G vs M/s.Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple et al regarding Injunction
The case involves plaintiff Sajai Kumar seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are managing the Valia Koonambaikulam Sree Bhadrakali Temple. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants are engaging in unauthorized construction on government land.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS. No.788/2019
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
The case involves Saneer and Fousiya as additional defendants, seeking to discharge a temporary injunction obtained by the plaintiff, Sijo Mary. The plaintiff claims a right of way over the property owned by the defendants, leading to disputes over property access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 237/2022
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.994/2016
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, claims ownership of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed and threatened him. The defendants express interest in purchasing the property but resort to violence when their demands are not met.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1011/2023
Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Dileep K J is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Raju and his family members, who are allegedly threatening to encroach upon his property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land and seeks to prevent defendants from trespassing and demolishing his property boundary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 828/2018
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 166/2023
Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, three advocates, are tenants of rooms owned by the defendant and are seeking to prevent eviction due to a rent hike. They claim that the defendant's actions threaten their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 815/2023
Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sadasivan, filed a suit against the defendant, Shiju, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the pathway on his property. The case revolves around the plaintiff's right to use the B schedule pathway for agricultural purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 284/2023
Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sasikumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Ushadevarajan and Thankamani Vijayan, who are allegedly attempting to encroach upon his property. The defendants have also obstructed the reconstruction of a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 976/2023
Case between Emilin Binoy et al vs Thresya Fernandes @ Tresa Albert et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Emilin Binoy, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thresya Fernandes and Jannet, who are attempting to illegally encroach on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and has faced threats and harassment from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 304/2022
Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Karmali, the absolute owner of a property, filed a suit against the defendant Charles for obstructing access to her property. The defendant allegedly began blocking the only pathway leading to the plaintiff's property, claiming ownership of an adjacent area.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 470/2024
Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.
Soman Pillai filed a petition against Radhakrishna Pillai for a temporary injunction concerning a property dispute. The plaintiff claims the defendant encroached on his property and caused damage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 753/2024
Case between Sankaran Nampoothiri vs Kollam Muncipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sankaran Nampoothiri is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Kollam Muncipal Corporation. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is planning to trespass and demolish boundary walls of his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 615/2025
Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction
Kiran Krishna, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against S.D. Ajith Kumar, the defendant, who cancelled her booking for a wedding reception at a temple auditorium. The case revolves around the plaintiff's efforts to secure the venue for her marriage reception scheduled for January 3, 2026.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.123/2020
Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, G.Rajesh and T. Jayasree, filed a suit for injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 601/2020
Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Reghu. K, Ratheesh. K, and Omana, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Rengan, Ponnamma, and Radhika Rengan, to restrain them from encroaching upon a pathway claimed by the plaintiffs. The defendants contend that the pathway is their property and deny the plaintiffs' right to use it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 194/2022
Case between Richard Hentry vs Nickolas Joseph et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Richard Hentry, the plaintiff, claims ownership and possession of a property from which he seeks protection against the defendants, his neighbors, who he alleges are attempting to trespass. The defendants are also his business partners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 14/2025
Case between Sugathan vs Shyama et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Sugathan claims ownership of property and seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing and damaging his property. The defendants, including Shyama and others, have allegedly attempted to widen a pathway and have caused damage to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 601/2024
Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Nazimudheen filed a suit against the defendants for permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain them from trespassing into his property. The plaintiff claimed he is the absolute owner and has been facing attempts of trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 453/2020
Case between Nazeeb vs Nizamudheen regarding injunction
The case involves a suit filed by Nazeeb against Nizamudheen over illegal construction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant began unauthorized construction that violated the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 222/2016
Case between Raghuveer vs Sree Vettakkorumakan Kshethram et al regarding mandatory injunction and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff Raghuveer has sued for a mandatory and prohibitory injunction concerning the use of a property pathway, which he claims is essential for accessing his owned properties. The defendants include a temple and its management board, which assert that the plaintiff has no legal right over the disputed pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 726/2013
Case between Gopinathan Pillai et al vs Sarojini Amma et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiffs, Gopinathan Pillai and others, are suing the defendants, Sarojini Amma and others, over the right of way to a burial ground. The case involves conflicting claims regarding a pathway leading to the burial site.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding declaring the right of easement and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 743/2023
Case between Beena vs Jayan et al regarding Declaration and Injunction
The plaintiff Beena filed a suit against the defendants Jayan and Jayalekshmi for a declaration of her easement rights and to restrain them from interfering with her property. The case involves a property dispute where the defendants removed slabs from the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 559/2024
Case between Abida Beevi vs Noushar et al regarding injunction and easement by grant.
The plaintiff, Abida Beevi, seeks a declaration of easement by grant and permanent injunction against the defendants who are her legal heirs. The case involves a dispute over a pathway used by the plaintiff to access her property which the defendants attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 473/2016
Case between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram represented by Rakesh Venugopal vs Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat regarding perpetual injunction
The case involves a dispute over property rights between Koozhoor Bhagavathi Kshethram and Mazhuvannoor Grama Panchayat. The plaintiff is seeking a perpetual injunction to prevent the defendant from forming a new way through the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 992/2012
Case between Manmadhan M.R et al vs Balabhadra Temple Managing Committee et al regarding temple management and administration.
The plaintiffs, members of the Mannazhath family, are suing to declare their right to manage the Balabhadra Temple, claiming that a committee formed by certain individuals is unlawfully interfering with temple administration. The defendants, a managing committee, argue that the temple is owned by the blacksmith community and that the plaintiffs have no rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 771/2021
Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.
This case involves a suit filed by Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha and Ramesan G against Tripunithura Municipality. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, which resulted in the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 847/2018
Case between M.C. Antony vs The Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
M.C. Antony, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Executive Committee of Erattakulangara Bhagavathy Devaswam, the defendant, to prevent forcible eviction from his business property. The case revolves around the claim of ownership and possession of the property by the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1437/2019
Case between Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom et al vs Jaya Gireesh regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiffs are Mukkottil Bhagavathy Devawom and its Bharana Samithi, while the defendant is Jaya Gireesh. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' repeated absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1035 /20 216
Case between Valsala Krishnankutty et al vs Mattammel Sree Subramania Swamy Temple et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Valsala Krishnankutty and her children, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who are associated with a temple. The plaintiffs contend that they are the rightful owners of a pathway necessary for accessing their property and allege the defendants are attempting to block this access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1263/2017
Case between Aiswarya Renjith vs The Padinjare Kuzhuvelil Temple et al regarding non-prosecution
The plaintiff, Aiswarya Renjith, was absent along with her counsel during the hearing. The court dismissed the suit due to non-prosecution since no proof affidavits or applications were filed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1298/2022
Case between P.G. Victor vs Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple regarding mediation report
The case involves P.G. Victor as the plaintiff and Thandaseri Sree Bhuvaneswari Temple as the defendant. The court delivered a judgment approving a mediation report between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 294/2006
Case between Sumitha Rahim et al vs Ramachandran et al regarding mandatory injunction and consequential reliefs
The plaintiffs are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, who are the office bearers of neighboring properties. The plaintiffs claim ownership of the properties and allege that the defendants are attempting to interfere with their possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 23 / 2016
Case between Alias vs Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, recovery of money and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Alias, claims ownership of a property and seeks to prevent the defendants from encroaching upon it and to recover damages for tree removal. The defendants contest the plaintiff's ownership, claiming the property is dedicated to a deity.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1484/2022
Case between Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
This case involves Kanjiravilakom Devi Temple and its representatives against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.1214/2014
Case between Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple et al vs Rajan et al regarding settlement scheme and injunction
The plaintiffs, including the Madathuvilakam Ilangam Temple, are seeking a settlement scheme and permanent injunction against the defendants who are mismanaging the temple. The case involves disputes over the administration and enjoyment of property associated with the family temple.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won