Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 559/2024

Case between Abida Beevi vs Noushar et al regarding injunction and easement by grant.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-06
Duration
approximately-1 year 2 months
Case Closed
Mon, 10/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Abida Beevi, seeks a declaration of easement by grant and permanent injunction against the defendants who are her legal heirs. The case involves a dispute over a pathway used by the plaintiff to access her property which the defendants attempted to obstruct.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff by declaring her right of easement over the pathway and permanently restraining the defendants from obstructing its use. The defendants are also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Declaration of easement and permanent injunction against obstructing the pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff by declaring her right of easement over the pathway and permanently restraining the defendants from obstructing its use. The defendants are also ordered to pay the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff coupled with unchallenged pleadings supported her claim of easement rights.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff coupled with unchallenged pleadings supported her claim of easement rights.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ext. A1 to A4 and C1 series would prove the case of the plaintiff. Pleadings and evidence of the plaintiff remains unchallenged. Hence the plaintiff is entitled to the decree as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1. It is declared that the plaintiff has right of easement by grant over the plaint C schedule pathway having a width of 70 cm. 2. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from making any obstructions to use and enjoyment of the plaint C schedule way by the plaintiff and from committing any waste or mischief therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abida Beevi
Party Age
60
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noushar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Noufal
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Navas
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazeera
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahida
Party Age
48
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Deed No. 260/1982, Settlement Deed No. 350/2018, Settlement Deed No. 439/2018, Land Tax Receipt dated 11/07/2024.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. Vinayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are permanently restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the C schedule pathway.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from making any obstructions to use and enjoyment of the plaint C schedule way by the plaintiff and from committing any waste or mischief therein.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's right of easement by grant over the C schedule pathway is declared.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiff has right of easement by grant over the plaint C schedule pathway having a width of 70 cm.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Sale deed No. 260/1982 of Eravipuram SRO establishes plaintiff's ownership and easement rights.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Settlement deed No. 350/2018 indicates ongoing rights related to property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Settlement deed No. 439/2018 documents transfer of property ownership to plaintiff's son while reserving rights.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax receipt supports the plaintiff's claim of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report identifies and confirms the pathways and property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Right of way obstruction
Case Code
Case between Abida Beevi vs Noushar et al regarding injunction and easement by grant.
Case Code Year
Case between Abida Beevi vs Noushar et al regarding injunction and easement by grant.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 07/14/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 10/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Gopinathan Pillai et al vs Sarojini Amma et al regarding declaration and injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thankamma vs Suja et al regarding Declaration and Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sharon.S.P et al vs Honey.S.P regarding Partition
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Meera Biju @ Meera Gangadharan vs V.Jayaprakash et al regarding declaration and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won