Similar Cases
Based on: OS 470/2024 — Case between Soman Pillai vs Radhakrishna Pillai regarding temporary injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Jincy, Binu, and an unnamed older defendant. The case arose from disputes over a pathway used by both parties and previous incidents of trespassing and threats by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 815/2023
Case between Sadasivan vs Shiju regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sadasivan, filed a suit against the defendant, Shiju, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendant from obstructing the pathway on his property. The case revolves around the plaintiff's right to use the B schedule pathway for agricultural purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 976/2023
Case between Emilin Binoy et al vs Thresya Fernandes @ Tresa Albert et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Emilin Binoy, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Thresya Fernandes and Jannet, who are attempting to illegally encroach on her property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property and has faced threats and harassment from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 601/2024
Case between Nazimudheen vs Shahul Hameed et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Nazimudheen filed a suit against the defendants for permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain them from trespassing into his property. The plaintiff claimed he is the absolute owner and has been facing attempts of trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.788/2019
Case between Saneer et al vs Sijo Mary regarding discharge of temporary injunction.
The case involves Saneer and Fousiya as additional defendants, seeking to discharge a temporary injunction obtained by the plaintiff, Sijo Mary. The plaintiff claims a right of way over the property owned by the defendants, leading to disputes over property access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 237/2022
Case between Suresh Kumar.S. vs Narayana Pillai et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Kumar.S. and Bindu Lekha, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Narayana Pillai and Madhusudhanan Pillai, to prevent them from interfering with the construction of boundary walls on their property. The plaintiffs assert that they are the rightful owners of the property and have faced disturbances from the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.994/2016
Case between Raveendran Pillai et al vs Kerala State et al regarding injunction.
Raveendran Pillai and Beena filed a suit against the Kerala State and other defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.210/2025
Case between Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple et al vs Biju Panicker et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioners include the Meloot Sree Durga Padmavathy Devi Temple and its representatives, who are seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents to prevent them from obstructing the reinstallation of the temple idol. The respondents include members of the temple committee who are alleged to be causing disruptions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 535/2021
Case between Yesudasan vs Jincy et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Yesudasan, claims ownership of a property and seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed and threatened him. The defendants express interest in purchasing the property but resort to violence when their demands are not met.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 1011/2023
Case between Dileep K J vs Raju et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff Dileep K J is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Raju and his family members, who are allegedly threatening to encroach upon his property. The plaintiff claims ownership of the land and seeks to prevent defendants from trespassing and demolishing his property boundary.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 828/2018
Case between Vishnu vs N. Muthulakshmi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Vishnu filed a suit against N. Muthulakshmi and Ramdas Potty for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the defendants from evicting him from the rented property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him to vacate the premises unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 188/2025
Case between Chellamma et al vs Thampi regarding injunction
The case involves Chellamma and her daughter Thankamani as petitioners against Thampi, the respondent. The petitioners seek an injunction to prevent the respondent from evicting them from their residence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 166/2023
Case between Adv.V.Vinayachandran et al vs Gayathri Devi regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, three advocates, are tenants of rooms owned by the defendant and are seeking to prevent eviction due to a rent hike. They claim that the defendant's actions threaten their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 284/2023
Case between Sasikumar vs Ushadevarajan, Thankamani Vijayan regarding permanent prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Sasikumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Ushadevarajan and Thankamani Vijayan, who are allegedly attempting to encroach upon his property. The defendants have also obstructed the reconstruction of a compound wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 626/2024
Case between Soudamini et al vs Rejimon et al regarding temporary injunction.
The plaintiffs, Soudamini and Vilasini, filed for a temporary injunction against the defendants, Rejimon, Sunil Kumar, and Sahadevan, to prevent them from encroaching on their property and causing damage. The defendants allegedly trespassed and demolished parts of the plaintiffs' property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 304/2022
Case between Karmali vs Charles regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Karmali, the absolute owner of a property, filed a suit against the defendant Charles for obstructing access to her property. The defendant allegedly began blocking the only pathway leading to the plaintiff's property, claiming ownership of an adjacent area.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 753/2024
Case between Sankaran Nampoothiri vs Kollam Muncipal Corporation regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Sankaran Nampoothiri is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Kollam Muncipal Corporation. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant is planning to trespass and demolish boundary walls of his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 704/2018
Case between Ansad et al vs Jameela Beevi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Ansad and Nabeesath, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Jameela Beevi and Nadirsha, to prevent them from interfering with a pathway they have been using for access to their properties. The defendants deny the existence of the pathway and claim it belongs solely to them.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 615/2025
Case between Kiran Krishna vs S.D. Ajith Kumar regarding Temporary Injunction
Kiran Krishna, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against S.D. Ajith Kumar, the defendant, who cancelled her booking for a wedding reception at a temple auditorium. The case revolves around the plaintiff's efforts to secure the venue for her marriage reception scheduled for January 3, 2026.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 807/2024
Case between G. Haridasan Potty vs Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
G. Haridasan Potty filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Perumon Sree Durga Bhagavathy Temple Devaswom after the defendants aimed to obstruct his daily rituals at the temple. The case centers around the plaintiff's rights to perform rituals at the temple without interference.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.123/2020
Case between G.Rajesh et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, G.Rajesh and T. Jayasree, filed a suit for injunction against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 342/2022
Case between Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple et al vs Bhasuran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kanjirammoodu Sree Nagaraja Temple and its Secretary Ganesh.T, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Bhasuran and Selvakumar. The case revolves around the defendants creating disturbances and attempting to encroach upon the temple property, which is managed by the new committee elected after the defendants were removed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 601/2020
Case between Reghu. K et al vs Rengan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Reghu. K, Ratheesh. K, and Omana, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Rengan, Ponnamma, and Radhika Rengan, to restrain them from encroaching upon a pathway claimed by the plaintiffs. The defendants contend that the pathway is their property and deny the plaintiffs' right to use it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 194/2022
Case between Richard Hentry vs Nickolas Joseph et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Richard Hentry, the plaintiff, claims ownership and possession of a property from which he seeks protection against the defendants, his neighbors, who he alleges are attempting to trespass. The defendants are also his business partners.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 14/2025
Case between Sugathan vs Shyama et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Sugathan claims ownership of property and seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing and damaging his property. The defendants, including Shyama and others, have allegedly attempted to widen a pathway and have caused damage to the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 453/2020
Case between Nazeeb vs Nizamudheen regarding injunction
The case involves a suit filed by Nazeeb against Nizamudheen over illegal construction. The plaintiff claims that the defendant began unauthorized construction that violated the Kerala Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 1013/2023
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
This case involves Bank of India as the plaintiff and Shibina. S and Shibu.S as defendants. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and is therefore not pressing the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 676/2018
Case between V.M.Jayaprakasan et al vs Ushakumary et al regarding injunction
The case involves V.M.Jayaprakasan and additional plaintiffs seeking a permanent injunction against Ushakumary and others to prevent obstruction of boundary wall construction on their property. The plaintiffs claim ownership and the defendants are accused of attempting to encroach on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 963/2023
Case between Moly Kutty vs Sajitha et al regarding Temporary Injunction
Moly Kutty filed a petition for a Temporary Injunction against Sajitha and Vidhesh regarding an illegally constructed kitchen shed that causes health hazards due to smoke and foul smell. The defendants reside next to the plaintiff and have constructed the shed without permission, prompting the plaintiff to seek court intervention.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 651/2022
Case between Krishnakumar vs Raghavan et al regarding realisation of money.
The case involves the plaintiff, Krishnakumar, seeking the realization of money from the defendants, Raghavan and Chellamma. The suit was filed under Section 26 Order 7 Rule 1 to 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 303/2017
Case between Johnson. P vs Sheela Sathyan et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Johnson. P, is seeking an injunction against multiple defendants including Sheela Sathyan and others. The counter claim was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 701/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs Rajeena.M, Manaf regarding realisation of money.
Canara Bank filed a suit for the realisation of money against Rajeena M and Manaf. The suit was heard and subsequently dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 489/2022
Case between Vishnu.P et al vs Beena regarding declaration, to set aside settlement deed and partition.
The plaintiffs, Vishnu.P, Rajesh.P, and Sarasamma, filed a suit against the defendant Beena for declaration and to set aside a settlement deed and partition. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing despite multiple opportunities.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 816/2013
Case between Subhash Kumar vs Suresh Kumar et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary, Recovery of Possessions and Injunction
This case involves the plaintiff Subhash Kumar and multiple defendants including Suresh Kumar. The suit was related to the declaration, fixation of boundary, recovery of possessions, and an injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 324/2021
Case between Jiji.A. Miranta vs Vijayamma Williams et al regarding injunction
Jiji.A. Miranta is the plaintiff in this case seeking an injunction. The defendants include Vijayamma Williams and her children, Hemanth Stalin and Rohit Stalin.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 89/2022
Case between Padma Kumari vs Madhusoodanan Pillai et al regarding Realisation of Money
Padma Kumari, the plaintiff, is seeking to realise an amount of Rs. 2,00,000 from the defendants for cutting down valuable trees on her property. The defendant claims they weren't responsible for the actions of their tenant who is alleged to have committed the act.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 416/2022
Case between Kunjumol vs The Kollam Corporation et al regarding permanent injunction.
The plaintiffs, Kunjumol and Aloysius, are husband and wife seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, including the Kollam Corporation and other governmental bodies. They claim to have continuous possession of 3.5 cents of land against illegal encroachment and threats from individuals affiliated with the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 1196/2013
Case between Prasanna vs Valsala et al regarding fixation and declaration
This case involves the petitioner Prasanna and several respondents including Valsala, Vimala, and others regarding a petition for fixation and declaration under the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner was absent and the petition was dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 181/2017
Case between Sheelabhayi @ Sheelakumari et al vs Syamala Kumari et al regarding appointment of a commissioner and surveyor
The plaintiffs, Sheelabhayi @ Sheelakumari and Jisha, filed a petition for appointing a commissioner and surveyor. The court dismissed the petition for default as the petitioner was absent and did not comply with the previous order.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 86/2015
Case between Rajan vs Sasidharan et al regarding partition.
The petitioner, Rajan, filed a petition for partition. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's absence and lack of representation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 526/2025
Case between Krishna L vs Akhelesh J Amarjyothi regarding injunction
Krishna L, a lady entrepreneur, seeks to restrain Akhelesh J Amarjyothi from unlawfully evicting her from her fitness center after an alleged criminal trespass. The defendant claims the plaintiff has no lawful possession due to a revoked licence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.221/2025
Case between Rajkapoor.K vs Sulfikkar et al regarding temporary injunction
Rajkapoor.K filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent Sulfikkar and the Authorised Officer of Canara Bank from forcibly evicting him from a property without returning a deposit. The plaintiff claims to reside in the property and is facing eviction due to a notice issued by the second defendant.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 675/2021
Case between Shinu et al vs Harinathan et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiffs, Shinu, Sini, and Kamalamma, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, Harinathan, Anu, and Satheesh, concerning their rights over a pathway. The plaintiffs claim ownership and express concerns over the defendants' actions to pave the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 675/2021
Case between Shinu et al vs Harinathan et al regarding cancellation of certain clause in title deeds and for injunction.
The petitioners, Shinu and others, are seeking an injunction against the defendants, Harinathan and others, who they claim are improperly trying to pave bricks on a pathway they believe is under their ownership. The defendants argue that the pathway is government land and they have rights to it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 810/2023
Case between B Santhosh Kumar vs Sindhu Kumari regarding declaration and temporary prohibitory injunction.
The case involves B Santhosh Kumar, the petitioner, seeking a declaration of his title to a property and a temporary injunction against his sister, Sindhu Kumari, who has allegedly trespassed onto his property. The petitioner claims to have inherited the property through a gift deed from his deceased father.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 824/2024
Case between Raju et al vs Madhu et al regarding injunction
The case involves Raju and Kamalamma as plaintiffs, seeking an injunction against Madhu and Bindu, the defendants. The plaintiffs claim that the defendants have constructed a house on their property without paying the full sale consideration, resulting in a dispute over the possession and potential sale of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 346/2024
Case between Rajan Edward vs Anupama regarding injunction
Rajan Edward filed a petition for an injunction against Anupama, regarding the usage of a pathway claimed to be obstructed by the defendants. The case involves allegations of encroachment by the defendants' father and subsequent actions taken by both parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 16/2020
Case between R.Bahuleyan et al vs Prasad.K et al regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, R.Bahuleyan and B.Devarajan, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendants, Prasad.K, Bindhu, Perayam Grama Panchayath, and The Deputy Director of Panchayat, to demolish an unauthorized construction affecting their property. The defendants have constructed a thatched shop without permitted authorization.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won