Similar Cases
Based on: OS. 207/2018 — Case between KPB Nidhi Limited vs Ambili et al regarding claim petition for recovery of loan amount
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS.109/2024
Case between Rini Titus et al vs Stephen Gomez et al regarding restraining from trespassing into properties
The case involves petitioners Rini Titus and Francis Gabriel seeking to restrain the respondents Stephen Gomez, Shaila, and Sherly Rajendran from trespassing into their properties and creating a new pathway. The petitioners claim that the respondents have falsely claimed a right of way through their properties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 627/2014
Case between Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz vs Safunnisa regarding declaration of title and recovery of possession.
The petitioner/defendant, Safunnisa, is contesting a request for further information from the plaintiff, Rabinsa @ Raphis Firdouz, regarding a school admission register. The court is reviewing the plaintiff's compliance with previous orders about document production.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 988/2016
Case between Radha vs Sujatha et al regarding withdrawal of suit with liberty to file a fresh suit.
Radha, the plaintiff, is involved in a case against Sujatha and Anilkumar regarding the fixation of boundaries and injunctions related to property. The plaintiff has requested to withdraw the suit to file a fresh case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 579/2012
Case between Anilkumar vs Valsala et al regarding impleadment
Anilkumar is the petitioner seeking to implead additional defendants in an ongoing civil case. The court has dismissed the application as belated without valid reasons.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 877/2024
Case between Ramla Beevi vs Sulfikkar regarding realisation of money
Ramla Beevi has filed a suit against Sulfikkar for the recovery of Rs 2,29,500 along with interest. She claims that Sulfikkar borrowed money from her, and despite requests, he has not returned it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 773/2024
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
C. Baburajan Pillai filed an application for an interim injunction against Nair Service Society and others regarding the conduct of elections and alleged illegal appointments of an adhoc committee. The case involves disputes over the administration of the Taluk Union.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 1085/2023
Case between Kulsam Beevi vs Kamarudeen et al regarding advancing the case.
Kulsam Beevi filed a petition to advance the case against Kamarudeen and others. The petition was heard in court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 353/2024
Case between Jayaprakash vs Jayaram Bhatt et al regarding injunction
This case involves a family dispute over the right to worship in a common family temple located in Kollam. The petitioner, Jayaprakash, claims that the respondents are obstructing worship and attempting to sell the property.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS. 659/2024
Case between Bhadradasaru vs Vijayan Pillai et al regarding Injunction
Bhadradasaru, the petitioner, is seeking an injunction against Vijayan Pillai and others who claim rights over the Sree Nagaraja Temple, which he alleges is part of his family's property. The respondents dispute this claim, asserting the temple is on government land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.1107/2016
Case between Mohanan vs Mani et al regarding acceptance of documents
The case involves a petition filed by the defendants for accepting certain documents. The matter was heard and decided by the court on 08/04/2025.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 39/2024
Case between N.Sundaresan vs Indian Bank regarding Temporary Injunction
N.Sundaresan filed a petition against Indian Bank for a temporary injunction to prevent the bank from recovering an alleged overcharged loan amount. The plaintiff claimed that the bank's demand for Rs.2,19,292 was illegal since he only borrowed Rs.35,992.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS. 167/2025
Case between Goutham Krishna vs Santhosh Kumar et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The petitioner, Goutham Krishna, seeks a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing access to a pathway serving their property. The defendants contest these claims, asserting their rights to the same pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.915/2024
Case between K.Vasanthakumaran vs Mohanan regarding Temporary Injunction
K.Vasanthakumaran, the plaintiff, is seeking a temporary injunction against Mohanan, the defendant, to prevent obstruction of access to his property. The plaintiff claims rights over a pathway leading to the kitchen of his house, while the defendant contests the ownership of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 857/2024
Case between P.Vilasini et al vs Nirmala et al regarding injunction order
The Petitioners/Plaintiffs, P.Vilasini and P.Vinodini, filed a petition to advance and extend the injunction order. The court dismissed the application after finding the injunction order to be absolute.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 881/2024
Case between Shabjan vs Shamnazeer et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The case involves Shabjan as the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants, Shamnazeer and Rehna, regarding the reconveyance of property. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have refused to return the property after taking a loan settlement.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS. 115/2025
Case between Smt.Bishi Mathew vs Subrahmanian @ Supran et al regarding advance posting of case and interim injunction
Smt. Bishi Mathew, a retired teacher, is the plaintiff seeking to advance the hearing of her case for an interim injunction. The respondents, Subrahmanian @ Supran and Suvarna, have not filed any objections.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.579/2012
Case between Anil Kumar vs Valsala et al regarding amendment of plaint for fixation of boundary of temple property
Anil Kumar, the petitioner, seeks to amend the plaint to fix the northern boundary of a temple property as per an old survey plan. The respondents, Valsala and others, object to this amendment, claiming it is based on a false report.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 749/2015
Case between Dakshayani, K.C. et al vs State of Kerala regarding reopening the evidence.
This case involves a petition filed by the plaintiffs seeking to reopen evidence. The State of Kerala is the defendant represented by the Secretary of the Revenue Department.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 137/2019
Case between Gopakumar et al vs Babu Balakrishna Panicker et al regarding mandatory injunction for removal of obstructions.
Gopakumar and Geethakumari, the plaintiffs, filed a suit against Babu Balakrishna Panicker and Preetha, the defendants, regarding the alleged obstruction of a pathway. The defendants sought an interim mandatory injunction to remove these obstructions as they impeded access to their property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding declaring the right of easement and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Radhamani Amma and other plaintiffs filed a suit against the Kerala State and others to declare their right of easement over a property and seek a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case involves multiple petitions for re-opening evidence and appointing a commission advocate.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 425/2024
Case between Dr. Geethakumari vs Pradeepkumar.P regarding lifting of attachment
The petitioner, Pradeepkumar.P, is seeking to lift the attachment on his property in a suit filed by Dr. Geethakumari for recovery of money. The case involves the petitioner providing security to satisfy the potential decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 142/2016
Case between Mohanan et al vs Santha et al regarding EA in EP in OS
This case involves petitioners Mohanan and others against respondents Santha and others regarding execution proceedings. The petition was heard by the court after being filed under the civil procedure code.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 299/2024
Case between Archana et al vs Nidheesh et al regarding Injunction
This case involves Plaintiffs Archana, Gopikrishna, Krishnankutty Pillai, and Sindhu Meenakshi Amma against Defendants Nidheesh, Nishanth, and Unnikrishna Pillai regarding a disputed pathway. The plaintiffs seek to restrain the defendants from trespassing on their property and obstructing their right of way.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS. 176/2018
Case between M.I.Alexander Panicker et al vs Balakrishna Pillai et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition suit filed by M.I.Alexander Panicker on behalf of the legal heirs of Gopala Pillai against the legal heirs of Paramu Pillai and Nani Amma. The petitioner seeks to review an order related to the cross-examination of a witness.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 291/2024
Case between Najitha.S vs Naushad et al regarding Temporary Injunction
The case involves Najitha.S as the plaintiff seeking a temporary injunction against Naushad and others regarding property usage and construction rights. The dispute centers on the peaceful enjoyment of certain amenities situated on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 937/2013
Case between Radhamani Amma et al vs Kerala State et al regarding review of order in IA 3/2025 and IA 4/2025
The plaintiffs, led by Radhamani Amma, are seeking to review a previous order that dismissed their petitions for reopening evidence related to easement rights on a disputed property. They argue that the dismissal has denied them a fair opportunity to present essential evidence and has led to a miscarriage of justice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 103/2025
Case between Raju Rajan et al vs Palkulangara Sree Bhagavathy Kshethra Yogam Trust et al regarding Injunction
The plaintiffs, Raju Rajan and others, are seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing their participation in the trust's General Body Meetings and elections. The case involves the plaintiffs' expulsion from the trust and their claims of illegality regarding that decision.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS. 862/2017
Case between Appukuttan Pillai et al vs Easwary Amma regarding settlement of matter
The case involves a petition filed by the first defendant, Easwary Amma. The matter is almost settled, and the court has allowed the interim application.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 705/2014
Case between State Bank of India vs Hena.S et al regarding EP No. 151/2020
The State Bank of India filed a petition against the judgment debtors Hena.S, N.Sivanandan, and Shah regarding an execution petition. The Court dismissed the execution petition for default as no fresh steps were taken.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 748/2019
Case between Subair et al vs Basheerkutty et al regarding maintainability of a suit for boundary fixation and recovery of possession.
The case involves the maintainability of a suit filed by the plaintiffs seeking the fixation of the boundary of a property, recovery of possession, and an injunction. The defendants challenged the suit on grounds of lack of title, possession, and necessary parties.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 1121/2015
Case between Preethy Mole. V.S. vs Sudha.D regarding execution petition.
The decree holder Preethy Mole. V.S. filed an execution petition against the judgment debtor Sudha.D. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS. 506/2020
Case between Reshmi.N.R. vs Retnammal et al regarding partition
The case involves a partition suit filed by Reshmi.N.R. The petitioners/defendants are seeking a supplementary preliminary decree to declare their shares in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 181/2025
Case between Murugan vs Dr.Ramanatha Pillai regarding Injunction
Murugan, the plaintiff, filed a petition for injunction against Dr.Ramanatha Pillai, the defendant, to restrain him from encroaching upon the plaint schedule property. The case revolves around the validity of a sale deed and a rent agreement between the parties.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS. 1035/2023
Case between State Bank of India vs Rahul.R regarding execution of a decree.
The case involves the State Bank of India as the Decree Holder and Rahul.R as the Judgment Debtor. The bank is seeking to execute a decree against Rahul.R.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS. 721/2024
Case between Balachandran Pillai.. V. et al vs The Nair Service Society et al regarding directing document production.
The petitioners are seeking to set aside the election of certain office bearers of the Karayogam, claiming the election was conducted illegally. They argue that relevant documents held by the fourth defendant are essential for a fair trial.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 256/2019
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Anjali Mohan et al regarding Execution Petition
The Federal Bank Ltd filed an Execution Petition against Anjali Mohan and Sreedevi.B for enforcement of a decree. The court dismissed the petition for default as no fresh steps were taken by the decree holder.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS. 465/2006
Case between A.Noushad et al vs Nissar Navab et al regarding EA.131/2018
The petitioners include A.Noushad and his family members, who filed an execution application against Nissar Navab and others. The court has dismissed the application as not pressed.
Execution Application
Defendant Won
OS.488/2019
Case between Ajithakumari vs Raveendran Pillai regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Ajithakumari filed a suit against Raveendran Pillai for fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction. The case resulted in an exparte decree against Raveendran Pillai, who later sought to set aside the decree citing inability to attend hearings due to illness.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.940/2018
Case between Sreekumar et al vs Anilkumar regarding declaration of title and injunction
The petitioner, Anilkumar, seeks to set aside an ex parte decree passed in favor of his elder brother, Sreekumar, regarding property rights. The case involves a petition for condonation of delay in challenging the decree.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.231/2023
Case between Georgekutty vs Biju Raj regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
The case involves a petition filed by the decree holder, Georgekutty, against judgment debtor Biju Raj. The petition was dismissed for default due to the absence of the decree holder.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.702/2021
Case between Shobana M.S vs Laika U regarding setting aside exparte decree
Laika U, the petitioner and original defendant, filed a restoration petition against an exparte decree passed in favor of Shobana M.S, the plaintiff, in a monetary suit. The petitioner claims there was a delay in filing the petition due to lack of communication with her lawyer.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. 271/2017
Case between Superintending Engineer, Kerala Water Authority et al vs Quilon District Water Authority Staff Co-Operative Consumer Store et al regarding Execution Petition
The decree holders include Superintending Engineer, Kerala Water Authority and others seeking satisfaction of a decree. The judgment debtors are Quilon District Water Authority Staff Co-Operative Consumer Store and its associated members.
Execution Petition
Plaintiff Won
OS. 601/2022
Case between M/s.Canara Bank et al vs Aparna.L et al regarding Execution Petition
M/s.Canara Bank is the plaintiff represented by its manager, seeking execution of a decree. The defendants include Aparna.L, Anilkumar, and Ajayan, who are judgment debtors in the case.
Execution Petition
Defendant Won
OS. 335/2025
Case between Sreehari.M vs The Manager, The Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd et al regarding injunction against salary deduction
Sreehari.M, the plaintiff, filed for an injunction against defendants for unauthorized salary deductions made to recover a loan liability of his deceased father. The plaintiff argues that these deductions are illegal and without consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. 461/2023
Case between Gracy George vs B.J.Vijayan regarding injunction.
The case involves a dispute between Gracy George, the plaintiff, and B.J.Vijayan, the 2nd defendant, regarding the trespass and construction activities on a disputed property. The 2nd defendant claims exclusive possession of the property, while the plaintiff alleges encroachment and seeks to establish boundaries.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.819/2024
Case between Sajna vs Deepa Mary regarding an interim injunction order
Sajna, the plaintiff, is involved in a legal dispute with Deepa Mary, the defendant, concerning an interim injunction order related to commercial premises rented for a poultry business. The defendant is attempting to evict the plaintiff from the property, which has led to the plaintiff seeking protection from the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.355/2024
Case between Leela vs Shahini regarding modification of injunction order
Leela, the petitioner/defendant, is seeking modification of an injunction order to allow construction of compound walls around her property. Shahini, the respondent/plaintiff, filed a suit for fixation of boundary and other consequential reliefs.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.349/2024
Case between D. Satheeshan et al vs Anil Kumar.R. et al regarding injunction
The case involves petitioners/defendants Anil Kumar.R. and Disha seeking an interim mandatory injunction against the plaintiffs D. Satheeshan, Ashok Kumar, and Smitha.S. The plaintiffs are accused of constructing a wall that obstructs the defendants' access to a pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won