Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 39/2024

Case between N.Sundaresan vs Indian Bank regarding Temporary Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-1 year 3 months
Case Code No.
39
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N.Sundaresan filed a petition against Indian Bank for a temporary injunction to prevent the bank from recovering an alleged overcharged loan amount. The plaintiff claimed that the bank's demand for Rs.2,19,292 was illegal since he only borrowed Rs.35,992.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the IA filed by N.Sundaresan, ruling that he failed to establish a prima facie case or prove that irreparable injury would occur if injunction was not granted.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the IA filed by N.Sundaresan, ruling that he failed to establish a prima facie case or prove that irreparable injury would occur if injunction was not granted.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to prove a prima facie case and that the balance of convenience was in his favor.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Here the plaintiff is failed to prove that he has a prima facie case and the balance of convenience is in his favour.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.Sundaresan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Indian Bank
Relation
represented by Officer, Karthika Muthailyar
Plaintiffs Documents
Passbook, Copy of Legal Demand Notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
G.Sudevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
I.Sowfiuar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
To restrain the defendants from illegally recovering the disputed amount.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is not entitled to get any relief as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Passbook
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was mentioned to show the record of loan taken by the plaintiff from the defendant bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Legal Demand Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was referenced to indicate the amount claimed by the bank from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/12/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between M/s.Canara Bank et al vs Aparna.L et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd vs Anjali Mohan et al regarding Execution Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Rahul.R regarding execution of a decree.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Hena.S et al regarding EP No. 151/2020
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s. Bank of Baroda vs Vaishak.A.P et al regarding Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Injunction Defendant Won