OS.940/2018

Case between Sreekumar et al vs Anilkumar regarding declaration of title and injunction

Court

THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-07-19

Duration

approximately-5 years 6 months

Case Code No.

940

Case Closed

Thu, 06/22/2023 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Anilkumar, seeks to set aside an ex parte decree passed in favor of his elder brother, Sreekumar, regarding property rights. The case involves a petition for condonation of delay in challenging the decree.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won

Interim Order

The court dismissed the petitions filed by Anilkumar, confirming the ex parte decree granted in favor of Sreekumar and the other plaintiffs.

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the petitions filed by Anilkumar, confirming the ex parte decree granted in favor of Sreekumar and the other plaintiffs.

Key Reasoning:
The court found negligence and inaction on the part of the petitioner in presenting the delay condonation petition.

Why Defendant Won:
The court found negligence and inaction on the part of the petitioner in presenting the delay condonation petition.

Supporting Evidence

The petitioner failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay. Based on the above dictum, it is a clear case of negligence and inaction on the part of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, these petitions are dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sreekumar
Party Age: 59
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vasanthi
Party Age: 69
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Indira
Party Age: 67
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Usha
Party Age: 58
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Suresh Kumar
Party Age: 56
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Anilkumar
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Vinayachandran. V.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The petition filed by the petitioner/1st defendant to set aside the exparte decree and condone the delay in filing the petition.

Evidence:

the petitions are dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification