Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. 243/2017

Case between The Kollam District, Postal Telecom and BSNL Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.No.880 et al vs The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL) regarding restoration of suit

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-11-21
Duration
approximately-8 years 7 months
Case Code No.
243
Case Closed
Thu, 10/05/2023 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Kollam District, Postal Telecom and BSNL Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.No.880 is seeking to set aside an ex-parte decree and restore the suit originally filed against The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL). The case has multiple hearings with delays resulting in the current petitions to condone the delay in filing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petitions filed by the defendant to set aside the ex-parte decree and restore the suit have been dismissed by the court due to the defendant's failure to show sufficient cause for the delay.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petitions filed by the defendant to set aside the ex-parte decree and restore the suit have been dismissed by the court due to the defendant's failure to show sufficient cause for the delay.
Key Reasoning:
Defendant failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay in filing the petition.
Why Defendant Won:
Defendant failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay in filing the petition.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner has failed to prove sufficient cause to condone the delay.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, these petitions are dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd (BSNL)
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Kollam District, Postal Telecom and BSNL Employees Co-operative Society Ltd.No.880
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P.Sajinath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner filed petitions to set aside ex-parte decree and condone delay.
Evidence:
So, I am not inclined to allow the petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Delay in filing written statement
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sat, 03/18/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 10/05/2023 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sreehari.M vs The Manager, The Kerala State Financial Enterprises Ltd et al regarding injunction against salary deduction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Georgekutty vs Biju Raj regarding petition under Order XXI Rule 10 and 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sreekumar et al vs Anilkumar regarding declaration of title and injunction
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won