Case Summary
The decree holder Preethy Mole. V.S. filed an execution petition against the judgment debtor Sudha.D. The court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the decree holder.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Preethy Mole. V.S.
- Party Age
- 37
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudha.D
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Subha.G.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP dismissed for default due to the Decree Holder's absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Decree Holder absent and no representation. Inspite of repeated opportunities were given, the Decree holder not ready to take any fresh steps. Hence EP dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2015