Similar Cases
Based on: O.S.No. 762 /2024 — Case between Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al vs Anita James, Corporation of Cochin regarding temporary injunction.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S No. 28/2023
Case between M/s. Gambier International Private Limited vs Darley Peethambaran et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, M/s. Gambier International Private Limited, is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from forcefully evicting them from the rented property. The defendants have entered appearance but filed written statements denying the allegations.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 64/2024
Case between Shivan M.V vs M. V Sarojini regarding injunction.
The plaintiff, Shivan M.V, is seeking an injunction against his sister, M. V Sarojini, regarding the use of a pathway that they jointly own. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant has been obstructing his ability to use the pathway, which is necessary for access to his property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 282/2025
Case between Muhsina P S vs Nizar V H regarding temporary injunction
Muhsina P S filed for a temporary injunction against Nizar V H regarding the business CMAS World Wide which she claims to own. The defendant is allegedly retaining possession of the business while failing to pay the agreed amount.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S. No.275/2025
Case between Krishnamritha V vs Chairperson, College Union et al regarding publication of competition result.
The petitioner, Krishnamritha V, a student, seeks a court order to publish her result for the Kathakali competition in MG University Kalotsavam 2024-25. The petition was filed after she participated in the competition based on a previous injunction.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 660 /20 25
Case between Greenal Joseph vs Century Club regarding attachment before judgment
Greenal Joseph, the plaintiff, seeks a pre-judgment attachment of a fixed deposit held by Century Club. He claims that the Club misled him regarding membership fees and that there are internal disputes affecting his membership status.
Injunction
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 77 OF 2015
Case between Pottammal Vakayil deceased Mammali Haji's children et al vs Enudheen @ Bava et al regarding Injunction
Case involves the plaintiffs, being children of Pottammal Vakayil, filing an injunction against the defendants. Defendants include various individuals related to Pottammal Vakayil through different family relations.
Injunction
Defendant Won
OS No. 87 / 2024
Case between Deepa S Vijayan vs Sundaram Finance Ltd et al regarding ad-interim injunction.
Deepa S Vijayan is seeking an ad-interim injunction against Sundaram Finance Ltd and others. The court granted the injunction to prevent the defendants from further actions regarding the vehicle mentioned in the plaint.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.237/2025
Case between Lini Mathew, Basil Mathew vs Joy regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Petitioners Lini Mathew and Basil Mathew sought an injunction to protect the boundary ridge of their property from destruction. Respondent Joy argued that the tractor movement was necessary for agricultural purposes and the ridge shouldn't be protected.
Injunction
OS No. 976/2024
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Benny John and Reena, sought a temporary injunction against the defendant, Anivrithan, to prevent him from selling a property involved in a disputed sale agreement. The defendant contested the allegations, claiming no such agreement existed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.856/2018
Case between Jayan. K.S et al vs M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jayan. K.S and Jayakumari Jayan, are a husband and wife facing threats from the defendants, M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd and its officers, regarding a loan for a truck. They seek a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from entering their rented house and making threats related to the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1549/2019
Case between Sasi vs Chokli et al regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Sasi and Soumini, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chokli, who attempted to obstruct their access to a pathway critical for their property. The case was brought due to concerns over the defendant's attempts to encroach on the pathway, impacting the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of their land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 76/2025
Case between Muhammed Rija P.M vs Thrikkakara Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Muhammed Rija P.M filed a suit against Thrikkakara Municipality seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction after the municipality removed a business signboard without proper notice. The court found that while the municipality could not act without due process, it could not impose a blanket prohibition on the municipality's actions.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S. No. 292/2025
Case between Samson T George et al vs Arun Kumar Karerat et al regarding temporary injunction
This case involves petitioners Samson T George and Babu Mathew seeking a temporary injunction against the respondents Arun Kumar Karerat, Samson Fernandez, Annerine Mildred D’Silva, and MIR Realtors Pvt. Ltd. The petitioners argue that failure to grant the injunction will cause them irreparable harm.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1125/2024
Case between Leena Sham vs M/s Google L L C et al regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Leena Sham has filed a suit against YouTube and her daughter, Sharikka Sham, seeking a permanent injunction to remove a video uploaded by her deceased son. The video is claimed to violate her privacy and has caused distress to the family after the son's death.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 626 /2022
Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Aseeb, a senior citizen, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing his access to a pathway that he claims is essential for ingress and egress to his property. The defendants, relatives of the plaintiff, contest the existence of the claimed pathway and the plaintiff's rights over it.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 995 / 2019
Case between Suresh Babu T vs Kiran M B et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Suresh Babu T, filed a suit against Kiran M B and Grace Cheriyan for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent his forcible eviction from a leased property. The plaintiff claims he invested significantly in his business and fears illegal dispossession by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 571 / 2020
Case between M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP vs M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, M/s Sinergia Media Labs LLP, filed a suit against the defendant, M/s Smart City (Kochi) Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd, seeking protection against eviction and service disruption. The case revolves around alleged non-payment of rent during the COVID-19 pandemic and the plaintiff's apprehension of unlawful eviction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 244 / 2023
Case between M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. et al vs Jayesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, M/s Melmont Constructions Pvt. Ltd. and others, are seeking a permanent injunction against the defendants, who are members of the Youth Wing of 'Lok Tantric Janata Dal', for obstructing access to the plaintiffs' development project in Ernakulam. The defendants staged protests claiming illegal activities by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 563/2025
Case between Jisha Mathew vs Jasar M K et al regarding temporary injunction.
Jisha Mathew, acting as the authorized agent of Mr. Ranjith Krishnan, filed a petition for temporary injunction against Jasar M K and Anas M A, who are alleged to have dumped waste on the property owned by Mr. Ranjith. The defendants denied the allegations and claimed ownership rights over the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 436 of 2022
Case between K.J Thomas et al vs Saumya Maju et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
K.J Thomas and others are plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Saumya Maju and others. The case concerns excavation activities by the defendants that threaten the plaintiffs' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 545/2024
Case between Soni Francis et al vs Pioneer Nirman India Pvt. (Ltd) et al regarding mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, Soni Francis and Lizzy Francis, claim their right to an exclusive car parking facility in a property owned by them in Pioneer Towers. They have been denied this right by the defendants, who are involved in managing the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 662/2025
Case between Shinod A.J vs The Branch Manager, M/s Sundaram Finance Limited regarding permanent prohibitor injunction
Shinod A.J filed a petition for a permanent prohibitor injunction to prevent the defendants from taking physical possession of a vehicle he owns, financed by them. The defendants claim the plaintiff has defaulted on the loan agreement and can take possession as per the arbitration provisions.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 208/2025
Case between Salma John Pol @ Salma Thampi et al vs Maglin Thimothiyos et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Salma John Pol, filed for an injunction against the defendants, which include a cooperative bank and individuals. The case involved a legal challenge under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 5 41/2019
Case between Varghese P Itoop vs Alliance residency owner's association et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Varghese P Itoop, is the owner of two commercial shop rooms and is involved in a dispute with the Alliance residency owner's association regarding the unauthorized removal of hoardings placed on his property. The association contends that the plaintiff violated their bye-laws, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 506/2025
Case between Girish K. R. vs Thomas J. Vayalatt et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Girish K. R., seeks an injunction against the defendants to prevent his eviction from a property he claims to have rented. The defendants, including State Bank of India officials, assert that the suit is barred under the SARFAESI Act and challenge the plaintiff's tenancy.
Injunction
Defendant Won
O.S No . 74/2025
Case between Dr. Saju Joseph vs Ramlu Alias Ramla et al regarding injunction
Dr. Saju Joseph is the plaintiff who has ownership and possession over the property in question. The defendants are accused of constructing an illegal shed obstructing access to the property.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
IA No. 1 / 2025
Case between Geetha Surendran W/o Surendran vs Kuriakose @ Kuriachan S/o Paulose regarding boundary dispute and injunction relief
Geetha Surendran seeks court intervention to prevent encroachment and construction on her property by Kuriakose @ Kuriachan.
Civil
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1463/2018
Case between Jose K.A. vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding rent enhancement and lease terms
Jose K.A. filed a suit against the Greater Cochin Development Authority challenging their unilateral increase in rent and security deposit for a leased shop. The plaintiff sought a declaration to enforce the original lease terms which limited rent increases.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 372/2019
Case between State Bank of India vs Raj R Nath regarding restoration of ex parte decree
The case involves Raj R Nath, the defendant, who filed a restoration petition to set aside an ex parte decree passed in favor of the State Bank of India, the plaintiff. The defendant argues that his absence was due to job loss and health issues during the pandemic.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 13/2018
Case between M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. vs V.J. Joy et al regarding perpetual injunction
M/s Swapna Bone Meal Co. seeks a perpetual injunction against V.J. Joy and others to prevent them from obstructing the operation of the bone meal unit. The defendants claim that the operation is illegal, causing environmental pollution and health risks to nearby residents.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 138/2022
Case between M.R. Gopinadhan Nair vs Secretary Perumbavoor Municipality regarding perpetual injunction and mandatory injunction
The case involves M.R. Gopinadhan Nair as the plaintiff, who is asking for a perpetual and mandatory injunction against the Secretary of the Perumbavoor Municipality and others regarding unauthorized constructions. The plaintiff claims that the defendants have violated building rules and encroached on his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 281/2025
Case between C A Shylan vs Shajan Antony @ Raphael regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
C A Shylan, the plaintiff and younger brother of the respondent, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Shajan Antony @ Raphael, who allegedly obstructed him from constructing a gate on a pathway. The case arises from a previous ruling concerning easement rights.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 180/2025
Case between Aloshious George vs Prakash P K regarding property disputes
Aloshious George, the plaintiff, is contesting against Prakash P K, alleging illegal construction and encroachment on a private pathway linked to his property. The case revolves around the defendant's actions affecting the peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiff's residence.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.1078/2015
Case between Abdul Manaf vs Fathima Ameer et al regarding Petition under Order 20 Rule 18
Abdul Manaf filed a petition that has been dismissed as not pressed. The defendants, including Fathima Ameer and others, were present but no representation was made for the petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1120/2017
Case between Benny Varghese vs Bussan Auto Finance India Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding mandatory injunction and realization of money
Benny Varghese is the plaintiff who claims damages against Bussan Auto Finance India Pvt. Ltd. and others related to the purchase of a Yamaha scooter. The plaintiff alleges collusion and deficiencies in service leading to financial loss.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.452/2019
Case between Biju.K.P. vs M/s. Tecsol Electronics Private Limited et al regarding dismissed suit for default.
Biju.K.P. filed a suit against M/s. Tecsol Electronics Private Limited and others. The court found that the plaintiff was repeatedly absent and satisfied that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 881/2020
Case between Mary Raju vs Greater Cochin Development Authority regarding declaration and injunction
Mary Raju, the plaintiff, seeks relief against the Greater Cochin Development Authority over a dispute regarding a rental agreement. The case revolves around the defendant's unilateral increase of rent which the plaintiff contests as illegal and against the terms of their lease agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 319/2023
Case between Zodiac Advertisers vs A One Milk Products (P) Ltd et al regarding jurisdictional dispute over a money realization suit
The case involves Zodiac Advertisers as the plaintiff seeking to establish jurisdiction in a suit against A One Milk Products (P) Ltd and its directors regarding a dispute over money owed for goods delivered. The defendants contended that the suit should be dismissed due to jurisdictional issues.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.1632/2019
Case between Softtouch Readymade, Clothing Pvt. Ltd vs Mar Sleeva Textile regarding setting aside an ex-parte decree
The case involves Softtouch Readymade, Clothing Pvt. Ltd as the plaintiff and Mar Sleeva Textile represented by Jaimon Jacob as the defendant. The defendant seeks to set aside an ex-parte decree issued against them due to non-appearance in court.
Restoration Petition
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1429/2016
Case between Tamil Virat Viswa Brahma Samajam et al vs Virat Viswa Brahma Samajam et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves a dispute between the Tamil Virat Viswa Brahma Samajam and the Virat Viswa Brahma Samajam over the use of the name and registration number of the society. The petition seeks to prevent the defendants from using the name Tamil Virat Vishwa Brahma Samajam, which is contested.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 743 /2024
Case between Anitha James vs Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Anitha James has filed a petition against the Park View Apartment Owners Welfare Association and its office bearers for causing obstruction in her renovation works at her apartment. The court is examining if the defendants have the right to prevent her from using common areas during her renovation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.706/2024
Case between Amer Anis @ Musthafa Thekkethil vs Vodafone Idea Limited et al regarding interim mandatory injunction for mobile number reactivation
The plaintiff, Amer Anis @ Musthafa Thekkethil, is seeking an interim mandatory injunction against Vodafone Idea Limited and its officials regarding the reactivation of his mobile number '9048899999'. He claims that the defendants unjustly disconnected his service and demanded a large payment to reactivate the number, which he has owned for over 25 years.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No.1199/2024
Case between Saira Basheer vs White Waters Owners Apartment Association et al regarding temporary injunction
Saira Basheer filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction against the White Waters Owners Apartment Association and Rena Melvin regarding monthly maintenance fees and a leakage issue in her apartment. The court issued an interim injunction restraining the collection of fees and displaying her name for non-payment until the issue is resolved.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.224/2024
Case between Rainbow Holmes et al vs Raja N regarding arbitration of a money dispute.
The case involves a petition by the defendant to refer the matter for arbitration concerning a money realization suit. The plaintiffs opposed the petition, arguing that the arbitration clause was not valid.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
I.A No. 2/2025
Case between Jolly Paul vs Poulose regarding being temporarily restrained from cutting rubber trees or trespassing
Case between Jolly Paul vs Poulose regarding temporary injunction to prevent damage to rubber trees and properties.
Injunction
OS No. 75 / 2025
Case between Peter P Paul vs Paul Kuriako et al regarding injunction
This case involves a request for an ad-interim injunction to prevent demolition or narrowing of a way and obstruction of transportation.
Injunction
OS No. 31 / 2021
Case between Paulose K.V, Sara vs Sarojini Kodiyan regarding Injunction
This is a suit for an injunction. The plaintiffs are the absolute owners and are in possession and enjoyment of 3.8 Ares of land in Resurvey No.311/17 (Old Survey No.194/2) in Block No.42 of Thiruvaniyoor Village.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.1119/2023
Case between Alex Vachaparambil and Tsarina Vacha vs Prestige Neptunes Courtyard Owners Association regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Alex Vachaparambil and Tsarina Vacha, are seeking a temporary injunction against the Prestige Neptunes Courtyard Owners Association to prevent them from obstructing their enjoyment of common facilities. The case revolves around disputes related to maintenance dues and access to common areas.
Injunction
Plaintiff Won