Case Summary
Biju.K.P. filed a suit against M/s. Tecsol Electronics Private Limited and others. The court found that the plaintiff was repeatedly absent and satisfied that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's repeated absence and lack of interest in proceeding with the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and showed no interest in proceeding with the suit.
The plaintiff was absent and showed no interest in proceeding with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Biju.K.P.
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Tecsol Electronics Private Limited
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mr. Shibu.S. Kottaram
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shabeer Abdul Rahiman
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Priyanka Gopi
- Party Age
- 34
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun Prasanth
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rapheeque.C.K
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nidhinkumar.K.B.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vidya.C.V.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vijeendra Chandran
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreya Kuriakose
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aimal.K.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Deepthy Bose
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chitra.S.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Shekha Siyad
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Seega Joy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nidhin.K.N.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Neethu Elizabeth
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in proceeding.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2019