Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S.No. 319/2023

Case between Zodiac Advertisers vs A One Milk Products (P) Ltd et al regarding jurisdictional dispute over a money realization suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-08-19
Duration
approximately-3 years 7 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Zodiac Advertisers as the plaintiff seeking to establish jurisdiction in a suit against A One Milk Products (P) Ltd and its directors regarding a dispute over money owed for goods delivered. The defendants contended that the suit should be dismissed due to jurisdictional issues.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition by the defendants to dismiss the suit was denied, as the court found that it had jurisdiction to hear the case based on where the cause of action arose.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court concluded it had jurisdiction since the cause of action arose within its jurisdiction as per the laws applicable.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Johnson.V.George (52 years) PB No.2026, S.A Road, Kadavantra junction, Cochin – 682 020

Defendants

A One Milk Products (P) Ltd (Age not specified years) Eravichera West, Sooranad South, Patharam.P.O., Kollam, Pin 690 522 Varithamby Susheelan (Age not specified years) Eravichera West, Sooranad South, Patharam.P.O., Kollam, Pin 690 522 Sudha Susheelan (Age not specified years) Eravichera West, Sooranad South, Patharam.P.O., Kollam, Pin 690 522 N.Sreenivasan (Age not specified years) Eravichera West, Sooranad South, Patharam.P.O., Kollam, Pin 690 522

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petition filed under Sections 20 and 151 of CPC was dismissed.
Evidence:
In the result, this petition is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The invoice details were used to establish the supply of goods and the cause of action.
Reference:
Document Type: Written Acknowledgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The acknowledgment was signed and sealed by the managing director of the defendant company, which supports the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The legal notice mentioned the place of delivery, reinforcing the cause of action.
Reference:
Document Type: Counter
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
The counter filed by the defendants stiffly opposing the petition provided insights into the jurisdictional contest.
Reference:

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 12/29/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases