Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S.No.1078/2015

Case between Abdul Manaf vs Fathima Ameer et al regarding Petition under Order 20 Rule 18

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Maneesha.K.Bhadran
Order Date
2024-01-20
Duration
Case Code No.
1078
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Manaf filed a petition that has been dismissed as not pressed. The defendants, including Fathima Ameer and others, were present but no representation was made for the petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition was dismissed by the court as it was not pressed, and there were no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed by the court as it was not pressed, and there were no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was not pursued by the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The absence of the petitioner led to the dismissal of the petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Manaf
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fathima Ameer
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sherin Ameer
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasnij Rahman
Party Age
14
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.Dileep
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.N. Vijayan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Annesh.K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Submitted petition not pressed.
Evidence:
Submitted petition not pressed. Counsel endorsed. Petition dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S.NO.
Case Code Year
2015

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Amer Anis @ Musthafa Thekkethil vs Vodafone Idea Limited et al regarding interim mandatory injunction for mobile number reactivation
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Tamil Virat Viswa Brahma Samajam et al vs Virat Viswa Brahma Samajam et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
II Additional Munsiff Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Zodiac Advertisers vs A One Milk Products (P) Ltd et al regarding jurisdictional dispute over a money realization suit
II Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Biju.K.P. vs M/s. Tecsol Electronics Private Limited et al regarding dismissed suit for default.
II Additional Munsiff
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Benny Varghese vs Bussan Auto Finance India Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding mandatory injunction and realization of money
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won