Case Summary
The case involves Raj R Nath, the defendant, who filed a restoration petition to set aside an ex parte decree passed in favor of the State Bank of India, the plaintiff. The defendant argues that his absence was due to job loss and health issues during the pandemic.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the reasons for the defendant's absence did not justify setting aside the ex parte decree.
The court determined that the reasons for the defendant's absence did not justify setting aside the ex parte decree.
Judgment Evidence:
The above petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
State Bank of India (Age not specified years)
Maintenance, Retail Asset Centralized Processing Centre, Vankarath Tower, Palarivattom Byepass Junction, Ernakulam, Kochin - - 682 024
Defendants
Raj R Nath (51 years years)
Thiruvathira, Udaya Junction, Kureekadu Village, Kanayannur Taluk
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside ex parte decree
Evidence:
this petition has no merits and hence petition is dismissed