Case Summary
M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries filed a Restoration Petition to set aside an order and restore the suit. The respondent, M/s. Future Electricals, was represented by one of its partners during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was dismissed as the petitioner was absent and not represented. No steps were taken by the petitioner.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Petitioner absent. Not represented. No steps seen taken. Petitioner absent continuously.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. Future Electricals
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bharath Murali
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Petition to set aside the order dated 11.11.2024 and restore the suit.
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Future Electricals regarding restoration of the suit.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Future Electricals regarding restoration of the suit.