Case Summary
The case involves a restoration petition filed by the defendants against an ex-parte decree. The petitioner was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Petitioner absent and not represented.
Petitioner absent and not represented.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Geetha Udayan (66 years)
32/131D, Chaithram, Javahar Road, Thammanam, Eranakulam – 682 032
Defendants
M/s. Sakthi Finance Ltd. (Age not specified years)
Land Mark Enclave, SA Road, Valanjabalam, Cochin – 682 016
Manager, Sakthi Finance Ltd (Age not specified years)
Land Mark Enclave. SA Road, Valanjabalam, Cochin – 682 016
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Requested to set aside the ex-parte decree dated 30/09/2023
Evidence:
Hence, petition is dismissed as not pressed.