Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No. 31 / 2021

Case between Paulose K.V, Sara vs Sarojini Kodiyan regarding Injunction

Court
THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha NA
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This is a suit for an injunction. The plaintiffs are the absolute owners and are in possession and enjoyment of 3.8 Ares of land in Resurvey No.311/17 (Old Survey No.194/2) in Block No.42 of Thiruvaniyoor Village.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiffs are granted permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing, demolishing the granite wall, or causing any damages to the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Plaintiffs are granted permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from trespassing, demolishing the granite wall, or causing any damages to the property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Paulose K.V (65 years years) Kuzhikkattukuzhiyil House, Marangattulli Kara, Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk Sara (63 years years) Kuzhikkattukuzhiyil House, Marangattulli Kara, Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Sarojini Kodiyan (about 60 years years) Chothamkuzhi Nirappel House, Marangattulli Kara, Thiruvaniyoor Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs granted a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
Plaintiffs proved their case through affidavit and evidence remained unchallenged

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiffs obtained the property by virtue of this deed
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Letter from Bank
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued from Union Bank of India
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt from Village Office
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Sketch prepared by Village Officer
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Complaint filed by plaintiffs
Reference:
Ext.A5 to A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by advocate commissioner Aswathy Krishnan
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases