Similar Cases
Based on: OS No. 84 / 2013 — Case between Benny Markose vs Aikkaranadu Gramapanchayath et al regarding boundary, recovery of possession, declaration, injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
I.A No. 8/2025 in OS No. 37 / 2020
Case between Nibin John et al vs Remanan et al regarding recovery of money
Case involves a petition to reopen evidence for just adjudication. Plaintiff seeks recovery of money.
Civil Procedure
Defendant Won
OS No. 30 / 2025
Case between Anilkumar vs C.K.Sivan regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case filed by Anilkumar against C.K.Sivan for permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent destruction of boundary and encroachment of pathway at Vadavucode Village.
Civil Procedure
Plaintiff Won
I.A No. 1/2025
Case between Joby Mathew vs K.F.Noby et al regarding election of office bearers
Petitioner Joby Mathew filed a temporary injunction against the Ernakulam District Arm Wrestling Association due to illegal election of office bearers and unauthorized organization of a championship.
Civil Procedure
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 9 / 2022
Case between Ulahannan et al vs Babu regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This is a civil case filed by Ulahannan against Babu for permanent prohibitory injunction. Ulahannan is seeking to prevent Babu from trespassing and causing obstructions on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Procedure
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 105 / 2024
Case between Canara Bank, Puthencruz Branch vs Matrix Paper Products regarding Recovery of Money
In the matter between Canara Bank, Puthencruz Branch and Matrix Paper Products, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff a sum of ₹7,51,307/- with future interest at 12% per annum. The defendant also needs to pay the costs of the suit.
Civil Procedure
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 174 OF 2014
Case between Abu Haji et al vs Perumanna Klari Gramapanchayath regarding recovery of possession
Plaintiffs filed suit for recovery of possession, but the suit was dismissed due to their absence in court.
Recovery of Possession
Defendant Won
OS No.316/2024
Case between Anandhavalli et al vs S Rajendran et al regarding Interim Relief
Petitioners Anandhavalli et al filed a petition seeking interim relief to prevent waste or mischief on the property. Respondents S Rajendran et al were restrained from alienating or dealing with the property until further orders.
Civil Procedure
I.A. No.06/2024 in O.S. No.749/2013
Case between K Rajkumar, et al vs K Rajalakshmi, et al regarding declaration of property ownership
Petitioner/Plaintiff K Rajkumar filed a petition to reopen evidence for a suit regarding the ownership of a compound wall. Respondents opposed the petition on the grounds of delay and lack of merit.
Civil Procedure
O.S. No.24/2021
Case between Remya Pillai, W/o Prashanth Kumar M R vs Annamma P B regarding Suit filed Under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
In the case O.S. No.24/2021, Remya Pillai, the plaintiff, aged 35 years, W/o Prashanth Kumar M R, residing at Mundakkal Kunnath House, Parambath Padi, Ezhakkaranadu South P O, Ernakulam 682308, Maneed Village, Piravom Taluk, Ernakulam District filed a suit which was ultimately dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not appear.
Civil Procedure
Defendant Won
I.A. No.05/2024 in O.S. No.1193/2024
Case between P M Bava vs Honey Ravindran regarding Injunction
Case involves a dispute over enforcing an Arbitral Award related to film rights. Defendant seeks rejection of the suit under Order VII Rule 11.
Civil Procedure
Defendant Won
O.S No. 871/2020
Case between James K.V et al vs S.Poorani regarding eviction suit
Plaintiff James K.V, Cochin Kalabhavan Programme Coordinator, filed a suit against defendant S.Poorani for eviction. Defendant claimed suit became infructuous due to eviction ordered in rent control proceeding. Suit dismissed for default.
Civil Procedure
Defendant Won
I.A. No.03/2025 in O.S. No.1432/2019
Case between Vinu Lal vs Ashok R Nair et al regarding Section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Case involves Vinu Lal and Ashok R Nair et al under Section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure.
Civil Procedure
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 1164/2023
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 12 NHG 30 Butterflies et al regarding Default Judgment
Case between IDBI Bank Limited and multiple defendants regarding default judgment on the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Procedure
Defendant Won
I.A. No. 11 of 2025 in O.S. 1180/2024
Case between Jose John vs Golden Metro Apartment Owners Association et al regarding injunction for election conduct
Jose John filed a petition seeking injunction for appointing an Advocate commissioner to conduct the election to the executive committee of the 1st defendant Association.
Civil Procedure
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 600/2022
Case between Elizabeth Joseph, W/o John V C vs Shana K et al regarding Suit filed Under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
This case involves a suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff, Elizabeth Joseph, decided to withdraw the suit due to loss of interest.
Civil Procedure
OS No. 13/2021
Case between C.V.Peter vs Alias George et al regarding declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction
Plaintiff C.V.Peter seeks declaration of prescriptive easement and permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Alias George, Palliyan, and Krishnankutty. The case revolves around a pathway used by the plaintiff to access his property through the defendants' properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 36/2021
Case between Jiji vs Valsa et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves Jiji as the plaintiff filing for partition and permanent prohibitory injunction against Valsa and others.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 36 / 2021
Case between Jiji vs Valsa et al regarding Suit for Partition
Plaintiff Jiji filed suit for partition of properties jointly owned by her and defendants related to deceased husband T.M. Baby. Defendants Valsa, Lissy Pappachan, and Ithakku involved as deceased husband's siblings.
Partition
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 33 / 2024
Case between Susy Paulose et al vs Eldho Mathai et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, legal heirs of late Sri. Paulose, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and causing damage to their property. Defendants failed to appear in court. Plaintiffs provided unchallenged evidence proving ownership and trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
I.A No. 4/2025 in OS No. 8/2025
Case between St.Peters and St.Pauls Orthodox Syrian Church, Puthencruz et al vs Mary Stephen et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs
Petition filed by St.Peters and St.Pauls Orthodox Syrian Church and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs regarding properties in Puthencruz Village. Dispute involves ownership and possession of land with coconut trees.
Petition under Order 39, Rule I of the CPC
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 86/2018
Case between Thankappan vs Lakshmanan et al regarding partition
This case involves a partition suit filed by Thankappan against his brothers and a few other defendants regarding the share of property and bank deposits left by their deceased father, Krishnan. The defendants were accused of attempting to withdraw the bank deposits without the plaintiff's consent.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 50/2015
Case between George vs Aliyamma, Biju Paulose et al regarding fixation of boundary and perpetual injunction
George is the plaintiff seeking to fix the boundary of his property against the defendants Aliyamma, Biju Paulose, and others. The defendants are claiming that their property overlaps with the plaint schedule property and are obstructing the plaintiff's request to demarcate the boundaries.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 152/2024
Case between Kannaki Viswanath vs Arun Viswanathan regarding partition.
Kannaki Viswanath and Arun Viswanathan are involved in a partition suit concerning the property inherited from their late mother, Jayanthi. The plaintiff sought a partition as the defendant was not amenable to it despite the co-ownership.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 05/2022
Case between Greeshma Devi vs Sudha Devi, Kristhudas regarding partition
Greeshma Devi, the plaintiff, is seeking a partition of property inherited from her deceased father P K Bharathan. The defendants are his second wife and son, who currently reside in the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.62/2020
Case between Mini vs Kunjappan et al regarding partition.
The plaintiff, Mini, is seeking a partition of the property after the death of her mother, Mariyakutty. The defendants include her father, Kunjappan, and her half-brother, Binu, both of whom have been set ex-parte for failing to appear before the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
FDA No 87/2019 in OS. No. 61/2014
Case between Babu et al vs Abraham et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a petition for a final decree regarding the partition of a property. The plaintiffs are seeking their share of the property, challenging the earlier decree passed in favor of the defendants.
Partition Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 61/2014
Case between Babu et al vs Abraham et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition of property among multiple plaintiffs and a defendant. The plaintiffs are challenging the defendant's claim over the shared property.
Final Decree Application
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 10 / 2021
Case between Ammini et al vs Ajitha Sunil et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Ammini and her sons Suresh Kumar and Sudheesh Kumar, are seeking a partition of property that belonged to their deceased husband and father, Palliyan. The defendants are Ajitha Sunil, the wife of another deceased son, and her minor son, who are jointly entitled to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 23 / 2016
Case between Alias vs Kerala Kshethra Samrakshana Samithi et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction, recovery of money and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Alias, claims ownership of a property and seeks to prevent the defendants from encroaching upon it and to recover damages for tree removal. The defendants contest the plaintiff's ownership, claiming the property is dedicated to a deity.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.22/2022
Case between IDBI Bank Ltd et al vs Nimisha Shinil et al regarding maintainability of suit for fixation of boundaries and injunction
IDBI Bank Ltd is the petitioner challenging the maintainability of a suit filed by Nimisha Shinil and others seeking fixation of boundaries and a permanent injunction against encroachment on a property. The court found the suit maintainable as the property in question was not mortgaged with the bank.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 04 / 2018
Case between Leela Chandran et al vs Karthyayaniyamma et al regarding declaration of rights over property
The case involves a petition filed by Leela Chandran and others seeking a declaration of their rights over a specific property and the fixation of its boundaries. The defendants contended that the proposed amendments to the plaint would alter the fundamental nature of the case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 33 / 2016
Case between Saranya Rajesh vs Yesodha Mani @ Manju et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Saranya Rajesh, daughter of Mr. Mani, filed a suit against Yesodha Mani and Saran Mani regarding the partition of the property left by her deceased father. The plaintiff claims a share in the property due to her status as a legal heir, while the defendants contest this claim based on a will executed by the deceased.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.45/2018
Case between David vs Baby, Kunjamma regarding mandatory injunction
David is the plaintiff who is seeking a mandatory injunction against Baby and Kunjamma, the legal heirs of his deceased brother Scaria. The plaintiff alleges that there was a mistake in the land deed regarding the property he owns and seeks to correct it through court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No.82/2019
Case between Mohammed Sheffik vs Murali Menon et al regarding declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Mohammed Sheffik filed a suit seeking a declaration and a permanent prohibitory injunction against Murali Menon and others regarding property ownership. The plaintiff claims to be a bona fide purchaser of the property, while the defendants assert prior claims and involvement in ongoing litigation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No.237/2025
Case between Lini Mathew, Basil Mathew vs Joy regarding temporary prohibitory injunction
Petitioners Lini Mathew and Basil Mathew sought an injunction to protect the boundary ridge of their property from destruction. Respondent Joy argued that the tractor movement was necessary for agricultural purposes and the ridge shouldn't be protected.
Injunction
O. S. No.279/2017
Case between Antony vs Shibu et al regarding Declaration, boundary fixation, and injunction
The suit involves siblings Antony and Shibu disputing the boundary of their inherited property, leading to unlawful encroachment by Shibu which Antony seeks to remedy.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.197/2016
Case between Anees Johny vs K L M Chits India Ltd. et al regarding adjudication of property rights
Case involves Anees Johny seeking adjudication of her alleged independent right over a property and setting aside attachment and sale related to second judgment debtor's share.
Civil Case
Defendant Won
O.S No. 866/2022
Case between Mini Jolly vs Noel et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mini Jolly, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction against her siblings, Noel, Seena Darwin, Rema Francis, and Shini Godson, regarding their shared inherited properties. The defendants allegedly leased out the properties without her consent, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
R.C.P. No.83/2024
Case between Mrs. Jaisy Roy, Roy Thomas vs Mr. Sunny. S regarding Lease and Rent Control Act petition
Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) & 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965. The respondent failed to comply with the court order for rent arrears.
Lease and Rent Control Act petition
O.S. No.415/2021
Case between Kochuthressia Thomas vs Gopalan, Kalidasan regarding recovery of possession and injunction.
Kochuthressia Thomas is seeking recovery of possession and an injunction against Gopalan and Kalidasan due to an obstruction on a pathway. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blocked access to her property, which she purchased and has a right to use as per the sale deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 234/2015
Case between Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar vs Suresh P.S, Mallika Shanmughan regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Santhosh P @ Santhoshkumar, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Suresh P.S and Mallika Shanmughan, regarding the fixation of the boundary of his property and preventing the defendants from trespassing. The case arises from allegations of encroachment and unauthorized construction by the defendants on the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No.1585/2019
Case between His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami et al vs Venkatesh Shenoy et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, His Holiness Shrimad Raghavendra Thirtha Swami, the Sole Trustee of a charitable trust, sought a declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Venkatesh Shenoy and Mohan Shenoy, claiming exclusive use of a pathway. The defendants contested the plaintiff's rights, asserting their own claims to the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 493/2022
Case between Rekha P.G vs Raji Dileep Kumar et al regarding partition of property.
The plaintiff, Rekha P.G, is seeking a partition of ancestral property against defendants Raji Dileep Kumar and Vijayalakshmi P.S. The plaintiff argues that she has a birthright to the property as a co-owner, while the defendants contest her claims.
Partition Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. .1531/2019
Case between Jobin Thomas vs Thrikkakara Municipality et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Jobin Thomas, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thrikkakara Municipality and Abdul Razak P.K. The case revolves around unauthorized demolition of property boundaries and potential construction disputes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1329/2018
Case between G Radhakrishnan vs M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
G Radhakrishnan, the plaintiff, filed a suit against M/s Goodhome Pvt. Ltd. and its managing director B R Ajit, along with Devi Ajit, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims ownership over a property and seeks protection against the defendants, who allegedly threatened to demolish his boundaries and trespass.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 1042/2019
Case between St Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam et al vs M J George et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, St. Mary Magdalene Church, Moothedam, seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants for trespassing on their land. The defendants argue that the plaintiff has no rights over the disputed property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 406/2018
Case between Velayudhan, Soman, Ambika et al vs Gopi O.A, Mohanan O.A et al regarding Partition
The case involves a dispute over the partition of property belonging to the deceased Kochupennu. The plaintiffs claim their rights as legal heirs, while defendants argue that Kochupennu had executed a will transferring her property to one of them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 426/2025
Case between Viswanathan R et al vs Kousalya et al regarding boundary excavation and property support.
The petitioners, a husband and wife, are seeking an injunction against the respondents over a dispute regarding boundary excavation between their properties. They claim their property is at risk due to the respondents' actions which have allegedly removed soil without providing lateral support.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won