Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS No. 84 / 2013

Case between Benny Markose vs Aikkaranadu Gramapanchayath et al regarding boundary, recovery of possession, declaration, injunction

Court
MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N A
Order Date
2025-11-19
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves Benny Markose suing Aikkaranadu Gramapanchayath and others for fixing boundaries, recovering possession, declaration, injunction in Aikkaranadu North Village.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Plaintiff awarded valid title over B-schedule property; boundaries fixed and injunctions given against defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Benny Markose (53 years years) Vandanathil House, Thonnikka Kara, Aikkaranadu North Village

Defendants

Aikkaranadu Gramapanchayath (Age not specified years) Aikkaranadu Gramapanchayath, Kadayiruppu Bavachan Varghese (45 years years) Kodiyampara House, Ilamkulam Kara, Aikkaranadu South Village

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff declared to have valid title over B-schedule property
Evidence:
It is hereby declared that the plaintiff has valid title over the B-schedule property.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of full possession from defendants
Evidence:
Vacant possession thereof shall be delivered to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Ordered defendants to demolish and remove structures
Evidence:
By way of a decree of mandatory injunction, to demolish and remove the biogas plant, name board, and all concrete structures.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrained defendants from entering or constructing on A-schedule property
Evidence:
Restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from forcibly entering the A-schedule property or putting up any new constructions.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed valid title of plaintiff over B-schedule property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Site Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Fixed eastern boundary of A-schedule property
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Mon, 12/16/2013 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Gramapanchayath

Similar Cases