Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
I.A No. 4/2025 in OS No. 8/2025

Case between St.Peters and St.Pauls Orthodox Syrian Church, Puthencruz et al vs Mary Stephen et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs

Court
The Court of the Munsiff Kolenchery
Judge
Smt. Sirsha N.A
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petition filed by St.Peters and St.Pauls Orthodox Syrian Church and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs regarding properties in Puthencruz Village. Dispute involves ownership and possession of land with coconut trees.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the relief of permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs sought by the plaintiffs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs
Case Type
Petition under Order 39, Rule I of the CPC
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

St.Peters and St.Pauls Orthodox Syrian Church, Puthencruz (null years) Kuzhivelil House, Puthencruz P.O, Ernakulam District-682308 Fr.Jithu Mathew (36 years years) Ikkarakunnathu House, Vadayambady P.O, Puthencruz, Ernakulam District-682308 Gladson K Chacko (62 years years) Kuzhivelil House, Puthencruz P.O, Ernakulam District-682308 Others (null years) null

Defendants

Mary Stephen (65 years years) Kanneth House, Puthencruz P.O, Ernakulam District-682308 Ken Kurian (35 years years) Kizhakkedath House, Vadavucode P.O, Vadavucode, Kunnathunad Taluk, Ernakulam District-682310 Others (null years) null

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Decree of permanent prohibitory injunction sought by plaintiffs
Evidence:
The suit is filed by the plaintiffs seeking a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence provided verbally by the plaintiffs
Reference:
Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Title deeds of the properties owned by the plaintiff church
Reference:
Ext.A1 to A5
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Tax receipts of the defendant properties
Reference:
Ext.B1, Ext.B2
Document Type: Location Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Location certificates issued by the Village Officer
Reference:
Ext.B3, Ext.B4
Document Type: Judgment Copy
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of judgment in a previous court case
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Report from the commissioner in a previous court case
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: RTI Act Reports and Letters
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Various reports and letters received under RTI Act
Reference:
Ext.B7 to B15
Document Type: Commission Report and Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report and rough sketch prepared by the advocate commissioner
Reference:
Ext.C1, Ext.C1(a)

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Church

Similar Cases