Original Suit No. 174 OF 2014

Case between Abu Haji et al vs Perumanna Klari Gramapanchayath regarding recovery of possession

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Sri. Biju V.G.
Order Date
2015-03-18
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Wed, 03/18/2015 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiffs filed suit for recovery of possession, but the suit was dismissed due to their absence in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Suit dismissed with cost
Case Type
Recovery of Possession
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs in court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Since the plaintiffs are called absent, suit is dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abu Haji
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o. Muhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunheethutti Haji
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o. Muhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kadeeja
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o. Sulaiman
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o. Musthafa
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sakeena
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o. Raheem
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Subaida
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o. Muhammed
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arifa
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o. Haja Muhiyudheen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Hamsa
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o. Moideen
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kunhayamma
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o. Moideen
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Perumanna Klari Gramapanchayath
Relation
Represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery of Possession
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiffs sought recovery of possession
Evidence:
Not mentioned

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Recovery of Possession
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Abu Haji et al vs Perumanna Klari Gramapanchayath regarding recovery of possession
Case Code Year
Case between Abu Haji et al vs Perumanna Klari Gramapanchayath regarding recovery of possession

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 03/18/2015 - 12:00
From
Sun, 03/01/2015 - 12:00
To
Tue, 03/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Gramapanchayath

Similar Cases

Case between Benny Markose vs Aikkaranadu Gramapanchayath et al regarding boundary, recovery of possession, declaration, injunction
MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between Hamza Haji vs Chakkalakkal Harif et al regarding property delivery
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Unniveettil Vinesh vs Velalkandiparambil Gopinathan regarding property delivery
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Abu Haji vs Perumanna Klari Gramapanchayath regarding Cost non-payment
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Soman.P vs Vettom Gramapanchayath et al regarding injunction
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Injunction Defendant Won