Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
I.A. No.06/2024 in O.S. No.749/2013

Case between K Rajkumar, et al vs K Rajalakshmi, et al regarding declaration of property ownership

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany, II Additional Munsiff
Order Date
2025-01-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner/Plaintiff K Rajkumar filed a petition to reopen evidence for a suit regarding the ownership of a compound wall. Respondents opposed the petition on the grounds of delay and lack of merit.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The petition to reopen evidence was dismissed, and parties were directed to bear their respective costs.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Procedure
Final Judgment
No
The petition to reopen evidence was dismissed, and parties were directed to bear their respective costs.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K Rajkumar
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o late Santhamma
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Rajalakshmi
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o T Sathyanathan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T Sathyanathan
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o late K P Raman Nair
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K Sethu Raj
Party Age
33
Relation
S/o T Sathyanathan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K C Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vimal K Charles
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Renju A T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E N Hari Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A T Anil Kumar (Anil Mamala)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishob K N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission report and plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff filed objection to the Commissioner's report and plan
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Procedure
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K Rajkumar, et al vs K Rajalakshmi, et al regarding declaration of property ownership
Case Code Year
Case between K Rajkumar, et al vs K Rajalakshmi, et al regarding declaration of property ownership

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 12 NHG 30 Butterflies et al regarding Default Judgment
Court of the Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Procedure Defendant Won
Case between Vinu Lal vs Ashok R Nair et al regarding Section 151 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Procedure Plaintiff Won
Case between James K.V et al vs S.Poorani regarding eviction suit
THE MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
Civil Procedure Defendant Won
Case between P M Bava vs Honey Ravindran regarding Injunction
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Procedure Defendant Won
Case between Remya Pillai, W/o Prashanth Kumar M R vs Annamma P B regarding Suit filed Under Section 26 Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Procedure Defendant Won