Case Summary
Greeshma Devi, the plaintiff, is seeking a partition of property inherited from her deceased father P K Bharathan. The defendants are his second wife and son, who currently reside in the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree of partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the partition of the plaint schedule property, awarding Greeshma Devi a 1/3 share and the defendants a 2/3 share.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved her entitlement to a share of the property based on the evidence presented.
The plaintiff proved her entitlement to a share of the property based on the evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved her entitlement to a share of the property based on the evidence presented.
The plaintiff proved her entitlement to a share of the property based on the evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
According to the plaintiff, the plaint schedule property is partiable and the plaintiff is entitled to get 1/3 share of the plaint schedule property. In the absence of any contra evidence, I believe that plaintiff is entitled to get 1/3 share of the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds by allotting 1/3 share of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff by actual division.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Greeshma Devi
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudha Devi
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kristhudas
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Purchase Deed No.9345/2007 of SRO, Puthencruz
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Vinu Sasidharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anila.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Prasad.P.George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Ajitha Appu
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Partition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Decree of partition of the plaint schedule property by allotting 1/3rd share to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows :- a)The plaintiff is entitled to get a decree of partition of the plaint schedule property by metes and bounds by allotting 1/3rd share of the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff by actual division.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Purchase Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Purchase Deed establishing ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between Greeshma Devi vs Sudha Devi, Kristhudas regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Greeshma Devi vs Sudha Devi, Kristhudas regarding partition