Similar Cases
Based on: O.S No. 573/2024 — Case between Aleyamma M V vs Pambady Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
O.S No.754/2019
Case between Thomas @ Baby et al vs Secretary regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thomas @ Baby and Mathew, claim to be the absolute owners of properties and are contesting the defendant's action of measuring their private road without legal right. The suit seeks to declare the road as private property and prevent the defendant from taking further action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 682/2017
Case between Jose K Joseph vs Ayarkunnam Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Jose K Joseph, the plaintiff, is the owner of a property who seeks to prevent the defendants from constructing a concrete ramp that would block his access. The defendants include the Panchayath and several neighbors who are asserting the right to construct the ramp.
Civil Suit
Partial
O. S. No.427/2017
Case between Rev. Fr. K George Jacob vs Vengola Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction
Rev. Fr. K George Jacob filed a suit against Vengola Grama Panchayath for a mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff alleges that the Panchayath obstructed the natural flow of rainwater, causing flooding in his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No.51/2022
Case between Sreethu P N vs George P M et al regarding temporary injunction for use of a road.
Sreethu P N filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from blocking a local road that has been in use for 50 years. The defendants are accused of obstructing access to the road, affecting the plaintiff's ability to reach their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 22/2018
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
Anilkumar filed a petition to withdraw his suit against Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath with permission to file a fresh suit. The case involves a dispute over a pathway and compliance with legal procedures under the Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 108/2019
Case between Venugopalan Nair vs Padmini Gopinadhan et al regarding mediation settlement
Venugopalan Nair filed a suit against Padmini Gopinadhan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, with lawful terms agreed upon by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 36/2019
Case between Aruna D. Pillai et al vs Pradeep Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Aruna D. Pillai and Damodaran Pillai, have filed a suit against defendants Pradeep Kumar, Narayanan Nair, and Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding a disputed property where the defendants allegedly attempted to widen a pathway encroaching on the plaintiffs' property. The plaintiffs seek a decree to restrain the defendants from such actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 81/2024
Case between Reena Thomas et al vs Shibu Thandamparambil et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves plaintiffs Reena Thomas, Ponnappan, and Vinl S. Anil against defendants Shibu Thandamparambil, Vinayachandran @ Vijayan, and Koruthodu Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S 206/2024
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
Philip is the plaintiff claiming possessory rights over a property. The case involves an FIR registered against him by the defendant Panchayath regarding the removal of rubber trees from the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 206/2024
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
The plaintiff, Philip, claims possessory rights over a property and seeks an injunction against the Erumely Grama Panchayath, which has allegedly interfered with his rights. The case involves previous ownership documents and claims of adverse possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 124/2018
Case between Varghese Chacko vs Secretary, Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Varghese Chacko is the plaintiff claiming title and possession over a property for more than 100 years. The defendants, including the Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath, are attempting to take possession of the property for constructing an Anganawadi.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 216/2024
Case between Shanavas P.H. vs Mundakayam Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of a suit.
Shanavas P.H. filed a suit against Mundakayam Grama Panchayath and its secretary. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No.69/2023
Case between Sunitha vs Udayanapuram Panchayathu regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Sunitha, initiated the suit against Udayanapuram Panchayathu. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No.472/2019
Case between Raju George vs Kottayam Municipality et al regarding injunction and other incidental reliefs.
Raju George filed a suit against Kottayam Municipality and P.R.Suresh Babu seeking to prevent the construction of a waste disposal plant on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the construction would obstruct his access and cause health hazards.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.429/2020
Case between Baby Scaria vs Daisy George et al regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Baby Scaria, is the absolute owner of a property and is seeking an injunction against the defendants who are his relatives. The defendants are allegedly interfering with the plaintiff's right to access his property by trying to remove a chain that blocks a private way.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 419/2023
Case between Rajesh R, Regha Rajappan, Renjith R, Rajamma Rajappan vs Lissyamma Jacob, Albin Jacob, Libin Jacob regarding injunction.
The case involves the plaintiffs, who are the children and wife of Late Rajappan, seeking an injunction against the defendants, who are descendants of Late Jacob Issac. The plaintiffs assert their right to a road that has been used for over 50 years and allege that the defendants attempted to obstruct this access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.429/2013
Case between Kuruvilla K. Mani et al vs Chacko Thomas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kuruvilla K. Mani and others, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from interfering with a pathway they claim as their right. The defendants, Chacko Thomas and others, deny the existence of the pathway and seek to dismiss the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No.662/2017
Case between Madhu K vs P.P Chandra Babu regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Madhu K is the plaintiff claiming that the defendant, P.P Chandra Babu, encroached on a road necessary for access to his property. The plaintiff seeks an injunction against the defendant's actions.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 504/2024
Case between Anu K Kurian et al vs Reghunathan T K regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves Anu K Kurian and K A Kurian as plaintiffs seeking a prohibitory injunction against defendant Reghunathan T K. The plaintiffs allege that the defendant has trespassed on their property and installed utilities without permission.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No.254/2023
Case between V.K.Rajumon vs Subha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves V.K.Rajumon as the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Subha and others. The plaintiff claims that the defendants were trespassing onto his property and constructing a road through it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 12/2022
Case between Subash K K vs Raman Kutty K K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff Subash K K is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing on his property. The defendants include Raman Kutty K K and his children, who have allegedly attempted to construct a wall on the plaintiff's land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 394/2024
Case between Raveendran P N et al vs Sreenivasan V K et al regarding simple injunction
The plaintiffs, Raveendran P N and Thankamani, are the owners of a property in Nattakom Village. They filed a suit to restrain the defendants from trespassing and threatening to widen a pathway that leads to their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 167/2024
Case between Sureshkumar vs Animon @ Kochumon et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sureshkumar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are attempting to cut a new road through his properties. The defendants did not file a written statement, leading to an ex parte decision.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 615/2024
Case between Jaybee Edufly Academy PVT Ltd. vs M/s Portobello Consultants Pvt. Limited regarding injunction
Jaybee Edufly Academy PVT Ltd. filed a suit against M/s Portobello Consultants Pvt. Limited for injunction, alleging unauthorized use of its name and goodwill. The defendant did not appear in court, resulting in an exparte decision.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 327/2025
Case between T M Saseendran et al vs Kottayam Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs are autorickshaw drivers who sought a court order to stop unauthorized business activities obstructing their parking space. They claimed that the Kottayam Municipality failed to act against these illegal activities despite complaints.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 711/2019
Case between Punnoose Joseph vs Abu C Abraham et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Punnoose Joseph, through his power of attorney holder M P Joseph, filed a suit against Abu C Abraham and Asset Homes Privet Ltd. seeking an injunction to stop them from removing piled soil and constructing in violation of law. The plaintiff claims ownership of the property in question and alleges violations of building regulations by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 200/2023
Case between Sijo P Chacko et al vs Santhosh Baby et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant for conducting activities causing sound pollution and nuisance. The plaintiffs, who are immediate neighbors, have alleged continuous noise disturbances despite their complaints to authorities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 630/2019
Case between Soby T Andrews et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Soby T. Andrews, represented by his mother, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and several officials regarding trees affecting access to his property. The case revolves around the demand to remove trees that inhibit vehicular access and threaten his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 170/2025
Case between Abdul Jabbar et al vs Jerin Kurian regarding injunction
The plaintiffs, Abdul Jabbar and his wife Jameela, are the owners of a property and seek to prevent the defendant, Jerin Kurian, from trespassing and destroying improvements on their property. The defendant has allegedly attempted to interfere with the plaintiffs' ownership.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 95/2019
Case between Ashok Babu vs Mary Joseph et al regarding injunction.
The plaintiff, Ashok Babu, claims the right to use a pathway for more than 23 years to reach his property. The defendants, including Mary Joseph, contest this claim by denying the existence of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 163/2022
Case between K Jacob @ Prasad vs Venugopal R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, K Jacob @ Prasad, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Venugopal R, to prevent him from trespassing onto his property and to protect his rights over the private pathway. The defendant has allegedly constructed a wall and gate obstructing the plaintiff's access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 313/2021
Case between Suresh Babu et al vs Vinod et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Suresh Babu and Prasadini, are the owners of a property and are seeking to prevent the defendants from encroaching on their land and obstructing construction. The defendants are contesting the claims made by the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O. S. No. 113/2024
Case between Alex Andrews vs Ashokan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Alex Andrews, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who are his neighbors, to prevent them from obstructing the repair of a boundary between his property and the Panchayath road. The defendants did not appear in court, resulting in the case being heard ex parte.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No. 168/2017
Case between Preethi vs Jyothis Jose regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Preethi, the plaintiff, seeks a permanent injunction against Jyothis Jose, the defendant, to prevent him from trespassing on her property. The dispute centers around access rights to the plaintiff's land and the defendant's efforts to create a new pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 100/2023
Case between P.A. Siddique vs Baiju, Reji, Sinaj regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
P.A. Siddique is the plaintiff seeking an injunction against his neighbors, Baiju, Reji, and Sinaj, to prevent them from enlarging a pathway on his property. The defendants allegedly attempted to widen the pathway by demolishing a separation wall.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 141/2017
Case between K.S. Mujeeb et al vs Muhammad Sajas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs K.S. Mujeeb and others seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Muhammad Sajas and others regarding the operation of a saw mill. The plaintiffs argue that the saw mill causes public nuisance and environmental pollution.
Civil Suit
Partial
O.S 342/2013
Case between C.K. Ravi vs K.K. Kalyani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
C.K. Ravi is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against K.K. Kalyani and others, who are alleged to have trespassed on his property. The case revolves around the possession of a 1-acre land disputed between the plaintiff and the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 288/2019
Case between Binni Mathew vs Alyamma Mathew et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Binni Mathew has filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Alyamma Mathew and others regarding the access and use of certain pathways related to her property. The plaintiff contends that her right to use the roads connecting to her property is being obstructed by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 348/2022
Case between The Travancore Devaswom Board et al vs Mundaakayam Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves The Travancore Devaswom Board and its Assistant Commissioner as petitioners seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Mundaakayam Grama Panchayath. The dispute concerns alleged trespassing and unauthorized construction on temple property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. 143/2021
Case between P.S Prabhakaran et al vs Sathiammal K.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, P.S Prabhakaran and Kuttappan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sathiammal K.S and Radhakrishna Pilla, regarding a disputed pathway. The plaintiffs claim a right of way over the pathway used for over 20 years, which the defendants allegedly attempted to obstruct.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 347/2022
Case between Thresiamma Philip vs The Chief Manager, The South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Thresiamma Philip filed a suit against The South Indian Bank Ltd. for a permanent prohibitory injunction to restrain the bank from taking possession of her agricultural land. The suit arose due to the bank's claim of possessing the property over a loan that the plaintiff could not repay.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 80/2022
Case between Sunil Mathew vs The South Indian Bank Ltd., The South Indian Bank regarding injunction
The plaintiff, Sunil Mathew, filed a suit seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the South Indian Bank to prevent them from taking possession of his mortgaged property. The defendants acknowledged the loan but asserted that they did not take actions against the property in question.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S 87/2024
Case between P.M. Mathew et al vs M/s Thomsun Aggregates et al regarding temporary prohibitory injunction.
This case involves petitioners P.M. Mathew and Babu Thomas who are seeking a temporary prohibitory injunction against several defendants engaged in quarrying and related activities. The plaintiffs allege that these operations are causing public nuisance and endangering lives in their community.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S 125/2022
Case between Jossy Thomas et al vs C. T. Chacko et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Jossy Thomas and Jolly Thomas, are involved in a legal dispute concerning their ownership of property against the defendants, C. T. Chacko and others. They claim that the defendants are attempting to trespass on their property and seek a prohibitory injunction to prevent this.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 218/2023
Case between Kurias Thomas et al vs Chacko Sajive regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Kurias Thomas and Marykutty, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Chacko Sajive, who is accused of attempting to forcibly evict them from their properties. The plaintiffs assert their rightful possession of the properties and claim the defendant has no legal rights to demand payments or enter their premises.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won