Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 108/2019

Case between Venugopalan Nair vs Padmini Gopinadhan et al regarding mediation settlement

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-03-22
Duration
Case Code No.
108
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Venugopalan Nair filed a suit against Padmini Gopinadhan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, with lawful terms agreed upon by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement reached by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in terms of the mediation agreement reached by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The mediation agreement was lawful and accepted by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The mediation agreement was lawful and accepted by both parties.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation agreement are lawful. Recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Venugopalan Nair
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Padmini Gopinadhan
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
A.B. Gopinadh
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reji
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohan Ram
Party Age
47
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Members residing in the 19th Ward of Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bilu G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Alex J. Edackattu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of mediation agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan referenced in the mediation agreement.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2019

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between Shanavas P.H. vs Mundakayam Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of a suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aruna D. Pillai et al vs Pradeep Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Reena Thomas et al vs Shibu Thandamparambil et al regarding dismissal for default.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won