Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS No. 170/2025

Case between Abdul Jabbar et al vs Jerin Kurian regarding injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
approximately-4 months 5 days
Case Closed
Tue, 08/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Abdul Jabbar and his wife Jameela, are the owners of a property and seek to prevent the defendant, Jerin Kurian, from trespassing and destroying improvements on their property. The defendant has allegedly attempted to interfere with the plaintiffs' ownership.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent trespassing.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent trespassing.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; The defendant or anybody under him are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, from demolishing the boundaries of the plaint schedule property, destroy the improvements in the same, commit waste therein, changing the nature and lie of the plaint schedule property and from doing any other acts detrimental to the interest of the plaintiff in the schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Jabbar
Party Age
72
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jameela @ Jameela AlukaranAlikunji
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jerin Kurian
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Power of Attorney no. 95/1992, Copy of Sale Deed no. 3055/1990, Tax Receipt, Possession Certificate
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Tharakan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
George Associates
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Richu Tharian George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Law Firm
George Associates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant and others are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste.
Evidence:
The defendant or anybody under him are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, from demolishing the boundaries of the plaint schedule property, destroy the improvements in the same, commit waste therein, changing the nature and lie of the plaint schedule property and from doing any other acts detrimental to the interest of the plaintiff in the schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the authority of the second plaintiff in favor of the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document proves the plaintiffs' ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the plaintiffs are paying taxes for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Possession Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the plaintiffs' possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report submitted by the court provides findings related to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This sketch outlines the physical layout of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Unknown
Relevance:
Witness testimony supporting the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between Abdul Jabbar et al vs Jerin Kurian regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Jabbar et al vs Jerin Kurian regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 08/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T M Saseendran et al vs Kottayam Municipality regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ashok Babu vs Mary Joseph et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between V.K.Rajumon vs Subha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anu K Kurian et al vs Reghunathan T K regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raju George vs Kottayam Municipality et al regarding injunction and other incidental reliefs.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won