Case Summary
The case involves V.K.Rajumon as the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Subha and others. The plaintiff claims that the defendants were trespassing onto his property and constructing a road through it.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff by restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from cutting open a new pathway through the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was sufficient and uncontested.
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was sufficient and uncontested.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was sufficient and uncontested.
The evidence presented by the plaintiff was sufficient and uncontested.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; The defendants and their men are hereby restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from cut opening a new pathway through plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.K.Rajumon
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subha
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ahalya
- Party Age
- 21
- Relation
- D/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paul Daniyel
- Party Age
- 39
- Relation
- S/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soumya Rajan
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/O
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kochumon
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- S/O
Plaintiffs Documents
30.12.2008 Sale Deed, 30.11.2022 Land Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Pradeep Kumar. S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants are hereby restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from cutting open a new pathway through the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed as follows; The defendants and their men are hereby restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from cut opening a new pathway through plaint schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between V.K.Rajumon vs Subha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between V.K.Rajumon vs Subha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.