Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Raveendran P N and Thankamani, are the owners of a property in Nattakom Village. They filed a suit to restrain the defendants from trespassing and threatening to widen a pathway that leads to their property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and their men are restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief to the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiffs, restraining the defendants from trespassing onto the plaintiffs' property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property, and there was no evidence against them.
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property, and there was no evidence against them.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property, and there was no evidence against them.
The plaintiffs established their ownership and possession of the property, and there was no evidence against them.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiffs. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.The defendants and their men are hereby restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief to the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Raveendran P N
- Party Age
- 72
- Relation
- S/o Late Nanu
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thankamani
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- W/o Raveendran P N
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreenivasan V K
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o Karuthakochu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph Thomas @ Jose Pallikkunnel
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o Thomas
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Uthuppan Thomas
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Thomas
Plaintiffs Documents
Cpoy of Sale Deed no. 205/1980, Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh Kesavanath P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
A permanent injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are hereby restrained from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and committing waste or mischief to the plaint schedule property.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale Deed no. 205/1980 submitted to establish ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document provided to support the claim of ownership and possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Court's report examined and used to assess the situation concerning the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Rough Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Sketch submitted as part of the commission report to illustrate the plaint schedule property and adjacent areas.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raveendran P N et al vs Sreenivasan V K et al regarding simple injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendran P N et al vs Sreenivasan V K et al regarding simple injunction