Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 163/2022

Case between K Jacob @ Prasad vs Venugopal R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-11-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, K Jacob @ Prasad, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Venugopal R, to prevent him from trespassing onto his property and to protect his rights over the private pathway. The defendant has allegedly constructed a wall and gate obstructing the plaintiff's access.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property and obstructing any construction on it.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Perpetual injunction against trespassing and obstruction.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a perpetual injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from trespassing onto the plaintiff's property and obstructing any construction on it.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the plaintiff's apprehension well-founded based on evidence of ownership and the defendant's actions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the plaintiff's apprehension well-founded based on evidence of ownership and the defendant's actions.
Supporting Evidence
The cumulative effect of the oral and documentary evidence establishes that the pathway belongs to the plaintiff, and the defendant has only a limited right of passage, with his actions having obstructed access.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The defendant and anybody under him is hereby restrained by a perpetual injunction from trespassing into plaint item No.1 and obstructing any construction in item NO.1 to protect item NO.1 to protect the property as well as in the boundary.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K Jacob @ Prasad
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopal R
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Partition Deed No. 634/1998, Rectification Deed No. 1559/2003, Rectification Deed No. 1445/2020, Sale Deed No. 238/2021
Defendants Documents
Property sale Agreement between the parties

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Philson Mathews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santhosh Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To restrain the defendant from trespassing and obstructing the plaintiff's property.
Evidence:
The defendant and anybody under him is hereby restrained by a perpetual injunction from trespassing into plaint item No.1 and obstructing any construction in item No.1 to protect item NO.1 to protect the property as well as in the boundary.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves plaintiff's ownership of the land.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Rectification Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Clarifies the modifications to the title of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Rectification Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further rectifies details regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1(b)
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the sale of part of the plaintiff's property to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Property Sale Agreement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Documents the agreement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Details findings from the local inspection regarding the access and property boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual representation of the layout discussed in court.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between K Jacob @ Prasad vs Venugopal R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between K Jacob @ Prasad vs Venugopal R regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Madhu K vs P.P Chandra Babu regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kuruvilla K. Mani et al vs Chacko Thomas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh R, Regha Rajappan, Renjith R, Rajamma Rajappan vs Lissyamma Jacob, Albin Jacob, Libin Jacob regarding injunction.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Baby Scaria vs Daisy George et al regarding injunction
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raju George vs Kottayam Municipality et al regarding injunction and other incidental reliefs.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won