Case Summary
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and costs of Rs. 7725.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing and taking actions against the plaint schedule property. Additionally, the defendants were ordered to pay costs to the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Not available
Judgment Evidence:
1)That the defendants and their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing any part of the building situated there or annexing any section of the plaint schedule property for widening of the road on the south and from committing any acts of waste in the plaint schedule property. 2)That the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 7725/-(Rupees Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Twenty Five only) to the plaintiffs being the costs of the suit.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- SURESH
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- RAHNA
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AKHILA MARIYAT
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C. K. NAZAR
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. T. K CHANDRAN
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Not specified in the order.
Defendants Documents
Not specified in the order.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Subramanyian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Anoop
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. M. Previn
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Mohammed Niyas Avukkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Ramdas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Akshaya. V. C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
That the defendants and their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing any part of the building situated there or annexing any section of the plaint schedule property for widening of the road on the south and from committing any acts of waste in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
that the defendants and their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing any part of the building situated there or annexing any section of the plaint schedule property for widening of the road on the south and from committing any acts of waste in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Cost
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
That the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 7725/-(Rupees Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Twenty Five only) to the plaintiffs being the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
that the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 7725/-(Rupees Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Twenty Five only) to the plaintiffs being the costs of the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.