Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 143/2021

Case between P.S Prabhakaran et al vs Sathiammal K.S et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Kanjirappally
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-03-27
Duration
approximately-3 years 8 months
Case Code No.
143
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, P.S Prabhakaran and Kuttappan, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sathiammal K.S and Radhakrishna Pilla, regarding a disputed pathway. The plaintiffs claim a right of way over the pathway used for over 20 years, which the defendants allegedly attempted to obstruct.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is partly decreed, restraining the defendants from causing any obstruction in the contested pathway, except for the area identified as item No. 5, over which the plaintiffs have no rights.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from obstructing the plaintiffs' use of the pathway.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is partly decreed, restraining the defendants from causing any obstruction in the contested pathway, except for the area identified as item No. 5, over which the plaintiffs have no rights.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs proved their longstanding use of the pathway and the defendants' attempts to obstruct it.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs proved their longstanding use of the pathway and the defendants' attempts to obstruct it.
Supporting Evidence
The commission report noted the existence of a mud road used by the public for over 30 years, supporting the plaintiffs' claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is partly decreed as follows: 1. Defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from causing any obstruction in plaint schedule item No.4, excluding plaint schedule item No.5, closing it, obstructing peaceful enjoyment of plaintiffs over that portion of item No.4 and committing any waste therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
P.S Prabhakaran
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kuttappan
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathiammal K.S
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishna Pilla
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Athul Krishnan A
Party Age
20
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Settlement deed No.516/1999, Land Tax receipt No.KL05011402841/2020, Certified copy of sale deed No.27/1/1996, Land Tax receipt No.KL05011406597/2020.
Defendants Documents
Certified copy of Partition Deed No.2869/1979, Land Tax receipt No.KL05011407764/2023, Acknowledgement receipt of Petition of Pallickathode Police Station.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreekanth K.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jolly James
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from causing any obstruction in plaint schedule item No.4.
Evidence:
Defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from causing any obstruction in plaint schedule item No.4, excluding plaint schedule item No.5, closing it, obstructing peaceful enjoyment of plaintiffs over that portion of item No.4 and committing any waste therein.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement deed No.516/1999 of Vazhoor SRO.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax receipt No.KL05011402841/2020 of Vazhoor Village.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No.27/1/1996 of Vazhoor SRO.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land Tax receipt No.KL05011406597/2020 of Vazhoor Village.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No.3627/1979 of Pampady SRO.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No.1059/92 of Vazhoor SRO.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition Deed No.2869/1979 of Pampady SRO.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land Tax receipt No.KL05011407764/2023 of Vazhoor Village.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Acknowledgement Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Acknowledgement receipt of Petition of Pallickathode Police Station.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by Advocate Commissioner M.T Babu.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch filed by Advocate Commissioner M.T Babu.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission report filed by Advocate Commissioner M.T Babu.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Survey plan filed by Advocate Commissioner M.T Babu.
Reference:
Ext.C2(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Right of way obstruction
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Thu, 07/29/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Kurian Antony vs Mariyamma @ Mariyam K. Joseph et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Chandravally vs Radhamani et al regarding partition and injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thresiamma Philip vs The Chief Manager, The South Indian Bank Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Syamala M.P. vs Prabhakaran et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anu K Kurian et al vs Reghunathan T K regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won