Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. 326/2022

Case between Chandravally vs Radhamani et al regarding partition and injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-10-31
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Code No.
326
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Chandravally, the plaintiff, seeks partition and injunction against her siblings, Radhamani and Mohanachandran. The case involves claims of joint ownership of certain properties and the defendants' alleged unauthorized actions regarding these properties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, ordering that the properties be divided into three equal parts among the plaintiff and defendants. Each party is entitled to one-third share of the properties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition and injunction granted.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, ordering that the properties be divided into three equal parts among the plaintiff and defendants. Each party is entitled to one-third share of the properties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the properties are partible and the actions of the defendants were unauthorized.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the properties are partible and the actions of the defendants were unauthorized.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence shown indicates that the plaintiff and defendants have equal rights over the properties and any cutting of trees was done without the plaintiff's consent.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and preliminary decree is passed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule item No.1 and 2 properties shall be divided into 3 equal parts, of which plaintiff and defendants are allotted 1/3 share each from both properties.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chandravally
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o Radhakrishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhamani
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o Radhakrishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mohanachandran
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o Gopala Pillai
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Partition deed No. 3253/07, Tax receipt Thandaper No. 7294 of the Chirakkadavu Village.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Kurian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prasanth P. Prabha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B. Ashok
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's request for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from cutting and removing trees.
Evidence:
The apprehension of plaintiff that defendants 1 and 2 would commit waste in plaint schedule item No.1 and 2 properties and cut down the valuable trees therein cannot be ruled out.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Partition of plaint schedule item No.1 and 2 properties into three equal shares.
Evidence:
The plaint schedule item No.1 and 2 properties shall be divided into 3 equal parts, of which plaintiff and defendants are allotted 1/3 share each from both properties.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit to come out of the estate.
Evidence:
The cost of the suit shall come out of the estate.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the partition deed No. 3253/2007 evidencing joint title and possession of the properties.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt corresponding to plaint schedule item No. 2 property owned by the deceased mother.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Certified copy of loan application detailing the loan availed by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.X1
Document Type: Loan Form
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Certified copy of the form for creating GEHAN associated with the loan.
Reference:
Ext.X2
Document Type: Loan Account Statement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Certified copy of the statement of account from the Ponkunnam service Co-operative Bank showing transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.X3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
O.S.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Sat, 04/30/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Usha V.P. vs Ramadevi regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Syamala M.P. vs Prabhakaran et al regarding fixation of boundary and permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between John Joseph et al vs Soosan Sabu et al regarding partition and separate possession.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won