Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 692/2020

Case between John Joseph et al vs Soosan Sabu et al regarding partition and separate possession.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-5 years
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs are siblings seeking partition and separate possession of a property inherited from their deceased parents. The defendants are the wife and children of the plaintiffs' deceased brother, contesting the plaintiffs' claim.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared that the plaintiffs are entitled to a 1/5th share in the property as legal heirs of late Joseph and Ammini Joseph. The defendants' counterclaim was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
A preliminary decree for partition and separate possession.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared that the plaintiffs are entitled to a 1/5th share in the property as legal heirs of late Joseph and Ammini Joseph. The defendants' counterclaim was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs successfully demonstrated their legal entitlement as heirs.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs successfully demonstrated their legal entitlement as heirs.
Supporting Evidence
The admitted facts show that all parties are Class I legal heirs. The defence failed to produce any document proving an irrevocable license or exclusive title.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: 1. It is declared that the plaintiffs are each entitled to a 1/5th share in the plaint schedule property as legal heirs of late Joseph and Ammini Joseph.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
John Joseph
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Omana Antony
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aniyamma Joseph
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soosan Sabu
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Akhil
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amal
Party Age
26
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jolsna @ Aleena Sabu
Party Age
20
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No. 1269/1976, Tax receipt No. KL 05031603733/2020, Building Tax Receipt No. 2063/2021.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P K Vinodkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
It is declared that the plaintiffs are each entitled to a 1/5th share in the plaint schedule property as legal heirs of late Joseph and Ammini Joseph.
Evidence:
It is declared that the plaintiffs are each entitled to a 1/5th share in the plaint schedule property as legal heirs of late Joseph and Ammini Joseph.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants 1 to 4 are together entitled to 1/5th share as legal heirs of late Sabu Joseph.
Evidence:
Defendants 1 to 4 are together entitled to 1/5th share as legal heirs of late Sabu Joseph.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants 5 to 8 are together entitled to 1/5th share as legal heirs of late Lisamma Joseph.
Evidence:
Defendants 5 to 8 are together entitled to 1/5th share as legal heirs of late Lisamma Joseph.
Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
A preliminary decree for partition and separate possession is passed.
Evidence:
A preliminary decree for partition and separate possession is passed.
Relief Type: Counterclaim
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The counterclaim of defendants 1 to 4 is dismissed.
Evidence:
The counterclaim of defendants 1 to 4 is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed No. 1269/1976 issued by Additional Sub Registrar Officer Kottayam.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt No. KL 05031603733/2020 dated 09.10.2020 issued by Village Officer Muttambalam.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building Tax Receipt No. 2063/2021 issued by Kottayam Municipality.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report prepared by Advocate Commissioner Aswin A.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Partition
Case Code
Case between John Joseph et al vs Soosan Sabu et al regarding partition and separate possession.
Case Code Year
Case between John Joseph et al vs Soosan Sabu et al regarding partition and separate possession.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam District, Kerala
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 06/30/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Itty Cherian et al vs John Chandy regarding partition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P M Hassankutty vs M P Mohammed Ashraf regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajappan vs MuraleedharanNair et al regarding declaration and injunction
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajappan vs MuraleedharanNair et al regarding declaration and injunction.
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won