Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 615/2024

Case between Jaybee Edufly Academy PVT Ltd. vs M/s Portobello Consultants Pvt. Limited regarding injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
approximately-1 year 4 months
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Jaybee Edufly Academy PVT Ltd. filed a suit against M/s Portobello Consultants Pvt. Limited for injunction, alleging unauthorized use of its name and goodwill. The defendant did not appear in court, resulting in an exparte decision.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, cancelling the MOU and restraining the defendant from using the plaintiff's name and goodwill.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The MOU entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant is hereby cancelled. The defendant is restrained from using the name board and goodwill of the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, cancelling the MOU and restraining the defendant from using the plaintiff's name and goodwill.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; 1.The MOU entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant is hereby cancelled. 2.The defendant is restrained from using the name board and goodwill of the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jaybee Edufly Academy PVT Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Joseph Tharakan
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Portobello Consultants Pvt. Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manoj Peter
Relation
Managing Director
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of memorandum of understanding, Copy of Termination Notice, Postal Receipt, Registered cover with notice
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P A Girishkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anishkumar K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is restrained from using the name board and goodwill of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
2.The defendant is restrained from using the name board and goodwill of the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The MOU entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant is hereby cancelled.
Evidence:
1.The MOU entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant is hereby cancelled.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Memorandum of Understanding
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the memorandum of understanding between the plaintiff and defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Termination Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of the termination notice issued by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Postal receipt related to the communication from the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Registered cover with notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Registered cover with notice sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Jaybee Edufly Academy PVT Ltd. vs M/s Portobello Consultants Pvt. Limited regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Jaybee Edufly Academy PVT Ltd. vs M/s Portobello Consultants Pvt. Limited regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 10/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Madhu K vs P.P Chandra Babu regarding mandatory injunction and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kuruvilla K. Mani et al vs Chacko Thomas et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajesh R, Regha Rajappan, Renjith R, Rajamma Rajappan vs Lissyamma Jacob, Albin Jacob, Libin Jacob regarding injunction.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Baby Scaria vs Daisy George et al regarding injunction
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Raju George vs Kottayam Municipality et al regarding injunction and other incidental reliefs.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won