Similar Cases
Based on: OS 108/2025 — Case between Natol Kumaran vs Natol Chandran regarding injunction for temple festival management.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
OS 31/2025
Case between KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA vs MINI regarding injunction
The plaintiff, KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA, filed a petition against MINI seeking an injunction to prevent her from trespassing and demolishing a shop building on the plaint schedule property. The case involves disputes over property ownership and possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 28/2025
Case between THARAVATTATH MARIYAM vs C. K. NASAR et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
The plaintiff, Tharavattath Mariyam, seeks a permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction against the defendants who have allegedly trespassed into the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claims that they caused damage to the Srambi building managed by the committee, which includes the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 6/2023
Case between KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI vs GIRIJA et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, GIRIJA and V. K. JITHESH KUMAR, to prevent them from trespassing on her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 54/2023
Case between Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan vs Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing into his property. The defendants have allegedly attempted to alter the nature of the property by cutting a road.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, who allegedly trespassed and caused damage to his property. The defendants have denied the allegations and stated they are not intending to trespass.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 132/2024
Case between SHINIL @ DEVASYA @ SHINIL JOSE vs SHEEBA @ MARIYAM @ SHEEBA THOMAS et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves Shinil Jose as the plaintiff claiming that the defendants trespassed into his property and threatened him, affecting his peaceful life. The plaintiff seeks a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 11/2025
Case between BUSHARA vs MUHAMMAD ASHRAF regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
BUSHARA instituted this suit against MUHAMMAD ASHRAF to seek a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining him from trespassing into her property. The plaintiff claims that the defendant threatened her and her family over alleged money transactions with her husband, who is abroad.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 123/2023
Case between P. Leela vs P. Narayan Nambiar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves P. Leela and Padmanabhan Nambiar as plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against P. Narayan Nambiar, the defendant, to prevent trespassing and reducing the width of a road. The defendant has also filed a counterclaim for mandatory injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI and others, to restrain them from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 34/2025
Case between Souda vs Executive Engineer, Secretary, Uralunkal Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Souda, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from trespassing and altering the boundaries of her property. The case revolves around the defendants' alleged encroachment on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 48/2024
Case between Sujith Thachanandiyil vs Rajeesh. E. K et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith Thachanandiyil, claims ownership and peaceful possession of a property and seeks an injunction against the defendants, Rajeesh. E. K, Narayani, and Subija, who allegedly trespassed and attempted to dismantle property barriers. The defendants assert they have a right of way through the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 3/2024
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sankaran. P. P, claims ownership of a property that the defendants trespassed into, causing damage and distress. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent further trespassing and damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 460 / 2020
Case between Shajahan TP vs Moideen P et al regarding Perpetual prohibitory injunction
The case involves Shajahan TP as the plaintiff seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The defendants were absent during the hearings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 233/2024
Case between Snehaja PV vs Syam Sachith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Snehaja PV filed a suit against her brother Syam Sachith seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent him from obstructing her access to their shared property. The court found that the defendant had been obstructing the plaintiff and imposed a decree in her favor.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 45/2021
Case between Premarajan K.N. vs Jiji P. et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction
The plaintiff, Premarajan K.N., is seeking relief against defendants Jiji P. and Anujith Ramachandran for alleged invasion of privacy through the installation of CCTV cameras. The defendants have been accused of causing the plaintiff irreparable harm by surveilling him and his family members.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 289 / 2023
Case between Geetha KP vs Ramesh Babu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Geetha KP, filed a suit against the defendants, Ramesh Babu, Valsan, Ravi, and Surendran K, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing on her property and committing acts of waste. The defendants had previously threatened the plaintiff and her husband while attempting to dig on the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.102/2021
Case between TP Roopesh et al vs Prameela et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
TP Roopesh and NP Anusooya are the plaintiffs seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against their neighbors, Prameela and Krishna Kumar, for illegal construction on adjacent property. The defendants have violated building rules, causing inconvenience to the plaintiffs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 41/2017
Case between Shiji.M vs Hassan Haji et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Shiji.M filed a suit against Hassan Haji and others seeking a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from trespassing into her property. The case involves disputes over property rights and unauthorized construction.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 174/2020
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Abdul Manzoor.P.P filed a suit against Edathil Balan and others for a perpetual prohibitory injunction to prevent them from changing the nature of a road that provides access to his property. The defendants were attempting to encroach upon this road, which is vital for access.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 616/2019
Case between Perikkathra Surendran vs Palakurumba Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Perikkathra Surendran, a retired civil contractor, filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for obstructing construction on his property. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants threatened him and his son, assaulted them, and unlawfully impeded construction activities.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.226/2024
Case between Rosemary vs George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Rosemary is the plaintiff claiming permanent prohibitory injunction against her brother George. The case revolves around the ownership and potential trespassing of the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No.780/2024
Case between Muhammed Rasikh.T.P vs Abdul Razak @ Bichu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Muhammed Rasikh.T.P is the plaintiff who is claiming ownership and possession of a property, while Abdul Razak and Sareena are the defendants accused of trespassing and attempting to construct a way through the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff seeks to restrain the defendants from such actions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.92/2024
Case between K.C.Chandran et al vs Sudha et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, K.C.Chandran and B.K.Vasanthakumari, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, Sudha and Akhil, to prevent them from obstructing access to their property and from damaging a water meter. The defendants have remained exparte throughout the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 141/2018
Case between Madhavi et al vs Ragini et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs Madhavi, Ajitha, Ajayan, Anitha, Ashalatha, and Amitha are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants Ragini, Rahul, Rekha, and others to prevent trespass on their property. The case revolves around property rights and possession over the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 494/2023
Case between Shajimath vs Jabir et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Shajimath filed a suit against Jabir, Rashid, and Assain seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The dispute involves the defendants allegedly trespassing and threatening to demolish a pillar at the plaintiff's property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 118/2023
Case between Adukkathil Moitheen vs Sunil Kumar. K.P, Aboobacker @ Bakker regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Adukkathil Moitheen has filed a suit against Sunil Kumar. K.P and Aboobacker @ Bakker seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff claims that the defendants illegally removed soil from his property, causing damage.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 69/2022
Case between Mohanan vs Souda. P.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Mohanan is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Souda. P.C and Aboobacker. The case involves a dispute over access to a pathway that the plaintiff claims is essential for reaching his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 107/2025
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company and its Managing Director P.Ahammed Kutty against Aneesh regarding a dispute over property boundaries and the installation of a no parking board. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to prevent the defendant from obstructing their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.124/2024
Case between Reena,T vs Kunhi Muhammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves plaintiffs Reena and Aadithya who are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent forceful eviction from their leased property. The plaintiffs contend that they have received threats of eviction despite being tenants and paying rent regularly.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 658/2018
Case between Angadi Veettil Padmini vs Angadi Veettil Vasudevan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Angadi Veettil Padmini, is seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing a pathway to her property. The defendants are relatives of the plaintiff, and the case revolves around the ownership and use of the pathway.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 592/2021
Case between Raman vs Thanka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Raman is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Thanka and Abhinand. The defendants are allegedly attempting to claim ownership over the property of the plaintiff, leading to this legal action.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.386/2022
Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Avaneendhran, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Latha Rani and Nagarjun alias Sujith. The case concerns a complaint filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for trespassing and threatening to dispossess him from his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 594/2022
Case between Sabira. M.T et al vs Sudheesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Sabira. M.T, Sakkeer Hussain, and Kurungott Thanuja seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants Sudheesh, Rathi, and Sulochana. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants obstructed their access to a public way that leads to their properties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 114/2023
Case between Meethale Arayammal Ismayil vs Kokkandiyeri Mahamood regarding setting aside of an ex parte decree.
Meethale Arayammal Ismayil filed a petition to set aside an ex parte decree dated 13.06.2024, arguing he had sufficient cause for his non-appearance due to health issues. Kokkandiyeri Mahamood, the respondent, objected, claiming the petition was without bonafides.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 84/2024
Case between KOMBIYULLATHIL THAZHAKUNIYIL ALTHAF vs KURUNNAM VEETTIL ABDULLA et al regarding issuance of summons
The case involves a petition filed by Kombiyullathil Thazakuniiyil Althaf against Kurunnam Veettil Abdulla and others regarding a request for documents in relation to a criminal case. The court found that the petitioner should apply for the certified copies directly from the JFCM Court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 127/2014
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
N. P. Padmakumar and others are petitioners seeking to reopen evidence in a long-pending case against Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji and others. The petitiioners aimed to mark a photocopy of a plan and permit issued previously.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 15/2024
Case between CHANDRAN vs SECRETARY et al regarding petition dismissal for default
Chandran, the plaintiff, filed a petition against the Secretary of Nadapuram Grama Panchayath and other defendants. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 59/2025
Case between Shahida. T vs Jameela Abdul Nazar et al regarding injunction against forceful eviction.
Shahida. T is the petitioner seeking to be impleaded as the 2nd defendant in a suit for injunction filed against her husband. The court found that she lacks authority over the property in question.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 29/2013
Case between KUNNOTH KUNHIKKELU vs KUNNOTH RAJU et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree
The case involves KUNNOTH KUNHIKKELU as the petitioner against KUNNOTH RAJU and others regarding a petition to set aside an exparte decree passed on 19.08.2014. The petitioner claims he was not informed about the proceedings due to multiple accidents in his family.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 3/2025
Case between Siddequl Akbar vs Muhammadali et al regarding injunction and mandatory relief.
The case involves Siddequl Akbar who is seeking permanent prohibitory injunctions against Muhammadali and others regarding a vehicle that was allegedly wrongfully taken from his possession. The suit also seeks mandatory relief for the return of the vehicle he purchased under an existing loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 35/2023
Case between GIREESAN vs SOOPY regarding restoration of a petition.
GIREESAN filed a petition against SOOPY under the Civil Procedure Code. The court allowed the restoration petition based on a proceeding from another court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 69/2021
Case between NAJEEB. K vs SOUDA et al regarding commission report and plan.
This case involves a petition filed by Najeev K against Souda and others regarding the remittance of a commission report and plan. The petitioner claims that the advocate commissioner failed to properly measure the plaint schedule property and requests a new commissioner to be appointed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 71/2021
Case between VALIYA PARAMBHATH MUHAMMAD KUTTY vs KEKKANDI KUNHABDULLA @ K. K. C. KUNHABDULLA MASTER regarding commission report.
The petitioner, VALIYA PARAMBHATH MUHAMMAD KUTTY, requested to remit back a commission report due to discrepancies in the property identification. The respondent, KEKKANDI KUNHABDULLA, objected, stating the petition was a delay tactic.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 151/2023
Case between REEJESH @ RIJEESH vs 1ASHOKAN et al regarding issuance of summons to the witness
The petitioner, Reejesh @ Rijeesh, who is the 4th defendant, filed a petition to issue summons for a witness. The court dismissed the petition on the grounds that it was belated and lacked necessary documentation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won