Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.386/2022

Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-09-29
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Avaneendhran, is involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, Latha Rani and Nagarjun alias Sujith. The case concerns a complaint filed by the plaintiff against the defendants for trespassing and threatening to dispossess him from his property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and disposing of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and dispossessing the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and disposing of the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found substantial evidence supporting the plaintiff's possession of the property and the threat posed by the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found substantial evidence supporting the plaintiff's possession of the property and the threat posed by the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is entitled to protect the peaceful residence of himself and that of the members of his family.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants, their men and agents are restrained by way of a decree for permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property, dispossessing the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property and committing waste therein.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Avaneendhran
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Latha Rani
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nagarjun alias Sujith
Party Age
23
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of settlement deed No.2074/2000 of SRO Meenchanda, Land tax receipt dated 13.06.2022, Building tax receipt dated 13.06.2022.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. L.S.Bhagaval Das
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Punya T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.A.V.Anvar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction as sought for.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the proceedings to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of settlement deed proving ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Land tax receipt supporting the plaintiff's claim of possession.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Building tax receipt supporting the plaintiff's claim of possession.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report by the Advocate Commissioner confirming the plaintiff's residence in the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan by Advocate Commissioner complementing the commission report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Avaneendhran vs Latha Rani et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 09/29/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Muhammed Rasikh.T.P vs Abdul Razak @ Bichu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rosemary vs George regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Perikkathra Surendran vs Palakurumba Gangadharan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Manzoor.P.P vs Edathil Balan et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shiji.M vs Hassan Haji et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Defendant Won