Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024

Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-10-09
Duration
approximately-1 year 7 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI and others, to restrain them from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the plaintiffs' possession.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered that the defendants be permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession, and ordered the defendants to pay Rs. 20689 as cost of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing and causing waste on the plaint A schedule property, and awarded costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the defendants be permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession, and ordered the defendants to pay Rs. 20689 as cost of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs successfully established their right to peaceful possession of the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs successfully established their right to peaceful possession over the plaint A schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

This court doth order and decree. 1) That the defendants, their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from constructing a shed, committing wastage, effecting any alterations, causing any damage that may affect the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROHITH
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KINARULLA PARAMBATH RASMA
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KINARULLA PARAMBATH REEBA
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI
Party Age
85
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
PATTUVARDHAN
Party Age
85
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
VAZHAYIL POYIL SHAJU
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SURESH
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ASOKAN. C. P
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Application for permanent prohibitory injunction, cost receipts
Defendants Documents
Cost list not put in

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. T. Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Manoharlal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
that the defendants, their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from constructing a shed, committing wastage, effecting any alterations, causing any damage that may affect the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
that the defendants, their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from constructing a shed, committing wastage, effecting any alterations, causing any damage that may affect the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
that the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 20689/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand Six Hundred and Eighty Nine only) to the plaintiffs being the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
that the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 20689/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand Six Hundred and Eighty Nine only) to the plaintiffs being the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Unauthorized occupation
Case Code
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 02/08/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA vs MINI regarding injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Souda vs Executive Engineer, Secretary, Uralunkal Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between VAZHAYIL KUMARAN vs CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL et al regarding declaration and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Abdulla Sons Private Limited Company et al vs Aneesh regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Benny John et al vs Anivrithan regarding temporary injunction
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won