Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 54/2023

Case between Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan vs Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan.B
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-1 year 1 day
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing into his property. The defendants have allegedly attempted to alter the nature of the property by cutting a road.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the plaintiff's request for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The judgment also awarded costs to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and cutting any part of the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the plaintiff's request for a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. The judgment also awarded costs to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved ownership and apprehension of harm due to the defendants' actions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved ownership and apprehension of harm due to the defendants' actions.
Supporting Evidence
This itself shows that the cause of action for the suit and the apprehension is admitted by the defendants. Thus, from the overall discussion of the evidence the plaintiff has successfully proved his case with regard to the relief he has asked for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs. The defendants, their men or agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing, committing waste, effecting alterations by cutting any portion of the plaint schedule property so as to make it as a road and also from doing any act that which may affect the peaceful possession of the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishn
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kizhakkayil Sajith
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kizhakke Parambhath Fousiya
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Paikkattummal Libash
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Kanam Kuzhikkanam Assignment Deed No. 999/2015 of SRO, Kavilumpara, Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Officer, Maruthonkara to Libin Balakrishnan
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. K. Vineesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants restrained by decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and altering the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants, their men or agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing, committing waste, effecting alterations by cutting any portion of the plaint schedule property so as to make it as a road and also from doing any act that which may affect the peaceful possession of the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to get the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified copy of Kanam Kuzhikkanam Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document establishes the plaintiff's title over the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Basic Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document shows that the plaintiff is paying tax for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
These reports provide evidence of the condition and alterations made to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1 to C4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan vs Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Paikkattummal Libin Balakrishnan vs Vazhayiil Meethal Chandran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 02/28/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between SHINIL @ DEVASYA @ SHINIL JOSE vs SHEEBA @ MARIYAM @ SHEEBA THOMAS et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sankaran. P. P vs Vijesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KAPPUMCHALIL DEVI vs GIRIJA et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The Court of the Munsiff, Nadapuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between THARAVATTATH MARIYAM vs C. K. NASAR et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won