Similar Cases
Based on: OS 64/2021 — Case between KUNHABDULLA vs KUNHALI et al regarding partition of property
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 523/2016
Case between Vilasini. P.K et al vs Asokan et al regarding partition.
The plaintiffs, Vilasini. P.K and others, are seeking a partition of property inherited from Korappan, while the defendants, Asokan and others, dispute the claim stating that the property is not partible. The court addressed the matter of shares among the plaintiffs and defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 9/2024
Case between VAZHAYIL KUMARAN vs CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, VAZHAYIL KUMARAN, seeks a declaration of his right to vehicular access through the property of the defendants, CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL and CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AZEEZ. The plaintiff claims he has an easement right due to an oral agreement with a former owner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 95/2017
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 / 2019
Case between Jose Antony vs K.D. Antony et al regarding declaration and consequential injunction.
Jose Antony is the plaintiff seeking a declaration that certain properties were purchased using his funds fraudulently by his father K.D. Antony and siblings. The case involves disputes over property ownership and claims of misrepresentation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.447/2019
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Muraleedharan filed a suit against Premanandan and others regarding a boundary dispute and injunction related to property access. The plaintiff claims trespass by the defendants on the access way to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 14 / 2021
Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
Girija filed a suit against Arunjith P, Sasikumar P, and the Secretary of Thalakulathoor Grama Panchayath seeking a mandatory injunction for unauthorized construction on her property. The plaintiff claims the construction is illegal and seeks mesne profits for its usage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.440/2023
Case between Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam vs Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam is the plaintiff seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property gifted to him by his mother, Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam. The defendants are members of the plaintiff's family who dispute the validity of the gift.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a declaration regarding their life interest in a property previously settled to their son, the second defendant. They claim that a loan taken by the second defendant against the property was unauthorized as their consent was not obtained.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 572 /2012
Case between E.S. Santhadevi et al vs Sarada et al regarding recovery of possession and declaration of property rights
E.S. Santhadevi and E.S. Maheshkumar, the plaintiffs, are seeking recovery of possession of property from the defendants, who include Sarada and others. The case revolves around property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 261/1999
Case between T.N. Devaki vs Padmanabhan Nair et al regarding setting aside the partition deed
The plaintiff, T.N. Devaki, seeks to set aside the partition deed claiming fraud and undue influence exerted by the defendants, who are her relatives. The case revolves around the legitimacy of the shares allotted to her in a disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.744/2023
Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.208/2025
Case between Mohanan P.D vs The Manager, State Bank of India regarding declaration of valid title deed
The plaintiff, Mohanan P.D, filed a suit for declaration regarding the validity of a title deed after the original was reported destroyed. The defendant, State Bank of India, admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit Nos. 353/2024
Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 526/2025
Case between Usman. E vs N. K. Abdurahiman et al regarding declaration of document as null and void
Usman. E filed a suit against N. K. Abdurahiman and others for declaring a document as null and void and for its cancellation. The plaintiff claims that the defendants transferred property without proper consent, causing potential harm to the Priyadarshini Study Centre.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 132/2022
Case between Nanu Arettummal vs Narayani Nellikunnummal et al regarding partition and separate possession
Nanu Arettummal, the plaintiff, is seeking partition of the jointly owned property after the death of his father. The defendants are opposing this claim, stating the property is not identifiable and they're not in joint ownership with the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 127/2014
Case between N. P. PADMAKUMAR et al vs KASTHURIKUNI MOIDU HAJI et al regarding reopening evidence.
N. P. Padmakumar and others are petitioners seeking to reopen evidence in a long-pending case against Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji and others. The petitiioners aimed to mark a photocopy of a plan and permit issued previously.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 3/2025
Case between Siddequl Akbar vs Muhammadali et al regarding injunction and mandatory relief.
The case involves Siddequl Akbar who is seeking permanent prohibitory injunctions against Muhammadali and others regarding a vehicle that was allegedly wrongfully taken from his possession. The suit also seeks mandatory relief for the return of the vehicle he purchased under an existing loan agreement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS 31/2025
Case between KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA vs MINI regarding injunction
The plaintiff, KANNATEENTAVITA SAROJINI AMMA, filed a petition against MINI seeking an injunction to prevent her from trespassing and demolishing a shop building on the plaint schedule property. The case involves disputes over property ownership and possession.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 503 /2018
Case between Sharmila @ Sharmi vs Vinsa Paul et al regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, Sharmila @ Sharmi, is seeking a partition of property that she claims to co-own with the defendants, who are her late husband's family members. The defendants argue that the plaintiff relinquished her rights to the property and have filed a written statement contesting her claim.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 75/2024
Case between Jayanthilal P.M. et al vs Jainy Suresh et al regarding partition of property
This case involves a dispute over the partition of property originally belonging to Mr. P.G. Muraleedharan. The plaintiff Jayanthilal P.M. and the defendants, who are his relatives, seek a formal division of their inherited property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1226 /2017
Case between Dhanya Oppath vs Baby Girija et al regarding public auction of properties
The petitioner, Dhanya Oppath, seeks a public auction for the properties in the final decree application, claiming that the current valuations are undervalued. The respondents oppose this, asserting they are willing to purchase the properties as assessed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1473 / 2016
Case between Lakshmi Velu et al vs Venugopalan N V regarding partition of properties
The plaintiffs, including the widow and children of late Velu, are seeking a partition of properties following his intestate death. The defendant, another son of Velu, claims that a family settlement from 2004 has already resolved the matter.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 336/2023
Case between Sunil Mohammed vs Smt. Meherunnisa regarding declaration and partition
Sunil Mohammed and Smt. Meherunnisa, the children of P.A. Mohammed Kunju and Kadeeja Mohammed Kunju, are involved in a suit for declaration and partition of their ancestral property. The case revolves around the missing brother, Sajith Mohammed, and the need to declare him dead for partition purposes.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S. No. 1158 /2013
Case between Rejitha Mol R., Renjitha Mol R. vs Renjith Kumar M.R, Geetha Reghunath regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Rejitha Mol R. and Renjitha Mol R., are the daughters of M.A. Raghunath, while the defendants are Renjith Kumar M.R, the son, and Geetha Reghunath, the wife. The case revolves around the partition of property belonging to their deceased father and allegations of misleading conduct by the first defendant regarding the execution of a partition deed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS No. 10 / 2021
Case between Ammini et al vs Ajitha Sunil et al regarding partition
The plaintiffs, Ammini and her sons Suresh Kumar and Sudheesh Kumar, are seeking a partition of property that belonged to their deceased husband and father, Palliyan. The defendants are Ajitha Sunil, the wife of another deceased son, and her minor son, who are jointly entitled to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.427/2021
Case between Rajesh Balakrishnan vs Sunitha Sundar et al regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Rajesh Balakrishnan, the plaintiff, seeks partition of property and injunction against his sister, her husband, and his mother. The dispute revolves around property inherited from their father.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS.No.1256/2020
Case between Santhamma.S vs K. Sasidharan Nair regarding partition of property
Santhamma.S, the plaintiff, is the widow of Late Sri. Kesava Pillai @ Kesavan Nair and is seeking a partition of property she shares with her son, K. Sasidharan Nair, the defendant. The plaintiff claims rights to a larger share of the property but the court found her claims insufficient due to lack of critical documentation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS.No.606/2019
Case between M. Lalitha @ Lalitha Rajagopal vs Surya Kumari et al regarding partition and permanent injunction.
The case involves a suit filed by M. Lalitha against Surya Kumari and her children for partition of property and a permanent injunction. The plaintiff claims co-ownership of the property inherited from their father, while the defendants contest this claim based on a will that they allege bequeathed the property to them.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 323/2019
Case between Darsana vs Rajamma et al regarding partition of property
Darsana filed a suit for partition and fixation of boundary regarding her half right over certain properties. The defendants include her mother-in-law Rajamma and her brother-in-law Vijayakumar, who contest her claims based on prior family agreements.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 81/2024
Case between CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI, BALAKRISHNAN vs VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
The plaintiffs, CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI and BALAKRISHNAN, filed a suit against VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH and the Secretary of the Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 26/2024
Case between Balan vs Vinil Babu regarding specific performance of a promise
The plaintiffs, Balan and Sarojini, are seeking a decree for specific performance against their son, Vinil Babu, regarding a property gifted to him for securing a loan. The defendant has breached the agreement to reconvey the property upon settling the loan.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 151/2023
Case between ASHOKAN vs THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE et al regarding suit dismissal for default
The plaintiff ASHOKAN filed a suit against THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE and its members. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 103/2024
Case between Reena vs Radhakrishnan. P. K et al regarding settlement of suit
Reena, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Radhakrishnan. P. K and others. The matter was settled between the parties through mediation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 5/2021
Case between MALAYIL DEVI vs MALOL ASOKAN et al regarding civil dispute
MALAYIL DEVI filed a suit against MALOL ASOKAN and others. The matter has been settled between the parties through mediation.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP/90/2025
Case between Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society vs Jithin PA et al regarding decree debt.
Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society is the petitioner seeking to recover a decree debt. The respondents have agreed to pay the debt in installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 127/2014
Case between N. P. Padmakumar et al vs Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory and Mandatory Injunction
The plaintiffs are N. P. Padmakumar and others, while the defendants include Kasthurikuni Moidu Haji and others. The case involves allegations of unauthorized construction and trespass on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 81/2025
Case between Sajith Kokkanneetavida vs Passport Officer regarding declaration of date of birth.
The plaintiff, Sajith Kokkanneetavida, seeks to declare his date of birth as 31.05.1988 instead of 31.05.1983 due to an error in the passport issued by the defendant. The defendant, the Passport Officer, did not appear for the proceedings.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 22/2024
Case between MUHAMMAD SHAFI vs YASAR regarding realization of money
Muhammad Shafi claims that Yasar borrowed Rs. 2,00,000 and has not repaid it despite promises. The case revolves around the validity of the loan and the obligation to repay it.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP/113/2024
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society et al vs Satheesan K, Rajeevan K regarding decree debt repayment.
Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society is involved in a case regarding a decree debt repayment by the respondents. The respondents have agreed to clear off the debt in installments.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 24/2023
Case between ASHOKAN. M. P vs BABY RAJAN et al regarding recovery of possession.
Ashokan M. P filed a suit against Baby Rajan and others for recovery of possession of the plaint B schedule property based on the plaintiff’s title. The cause of action arose on 23-12-2022.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 123/2024
Case between HAMEED HAJI et al vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
HAMEED HAJI and others are plaintiffs suing VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent trespassing into their property and related acts. The case arose due to actions taken by the defendants on 18-11-2024.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 121/2024
Case between Mundiyott ABOOBACKER vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
Mundiyott ABOOBACKER is the plaintiff in this civil suit. The case involved a dispute leading to the plaintiff not pressing the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 23/2024
Case between KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA et al vs KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, KINARULLA PARAMBATH ROOPA and others, are seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, KIZHAKKUM MURI GULIKAN PARIPALANA SAMITHI and others, to restrain them from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and interfering with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No 34/2025
Case between Souda vs Executive Engineer, Secretary, Uralunkal Labour Contract Co-operative Society Limited regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Souda, sought a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from trespassing and altering the boundaries of her property. The case revolves around the defendants' alleged encroachment on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 691/2018
Case between Thressiamma Kunjumon et al vs Pennamma Devasia et al regarding declaration and partition
The plaintiffs, Thressiamma Kunjumon and Mary K A, are seeking a declaration of their rights over certain properties originally owned by their mother, Chinnamma. The defendants, including Pennamma Devasia and others, contest these claims based on various Wills executed by Chinnamma.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 260/2023
Case between Roy Joseph vs Tomy Joseph regarding partition and fixation of boundary.
Roy Joseph and Tomy Joseph, brothers, are involved in a dispute over a paddy field they allegedly co-own. The plaintiff seeks partition and boundary fixation due to the defendant's alleged mischief.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won