Case Summary
MALAYIL DEVI filed a suit against MALOL ASOKAN and others. The matter has been settled between the parties through mediation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit has been dismissed as per the terms of mediation arrived at by the parties. An additional remuneration of Rs. 20,000/- has been directed to be paid by the plaintiff to the Advocate Commissioner.
Key Reasoning:
The dispute was settled between the parties through mediation.
The dispute was settled between the parties through mediation.
Why Defendant Won:
The dispute was settled between the parties through mediation.
The dispute was settled between the parties through mediation.
Supporting Evidence
Matter settled between parties.
Judgment Evidence:
This suit coming on this day for hearing before me... Suit is dismissed as per the terms of mediation arrived at.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- MALAYIL DEVI
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- MALOL ASOKAN
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- MALOL SHYLESH
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SECRETARY, GRAMA PANCHAYATH OFFICE
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. R. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Balagopalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Mini. K. Koyeri
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Arunkumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Pradeepan. U. V
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as per the terms of mediation arrived at
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as per the terms of mediation arrived at.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is directed to pay additional remuneration of Rs. 20,000/- to the Adv. Commissioner for the volume of work done
Evidence:
Plaintiff is directed to pay additional remuneration of Rs. 20,000/- to the Adv. Commissioner for the volume of work done.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between MALAYIL DEVI vs MALOL ASOKAN et al regarding civil dispute
Case Code Year
Case between MALAYIL DEVI vs MALOL ASOKAN et al regarding civil dispute
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement