Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 81/2025

Case between Sajith Kokkanneetavida vs Passport Officer regarding declaration of date of birth.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-07-28
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Sajith Kokkanneetavida, seeks to declare his date of birth as 31.05.1988 instead of 31.05.1983 due to an error in the passport issued by the defendant. The defendant, the Passport Officer, did not appear for the proceedings.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared the plaintiff's date of birth as 31.05.1988 and directed the defendant to correct the passport within one month.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Date of birth correction in passport and costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared the plaintiff's date of birth as 31.05.1988 and directed the defendant to correct the passport within one month.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence produced by the plaintiff established that the date of birth in the passport was erroneous.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence produced by the plaintiff established that the date of birth in the passport was erroneous.
Supporting Evidence
The details of his date of birth in Ext.A2 to A8 documents cannot be shut down as it clearly shows that the plaintiff was born on 31.05.1988.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed with costs. The date of birth of the plaintiff shown in the passport as 31.05.1983 has to be corrected and is declared that the date of birth of the plaintiff is 31.05.1988.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajith Kokkanneetavida
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Passport Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Passport (No. GO913869), PAN Card (No. JGYPK1351P), Driving License (No. KL5820180001858), Election Identity Card (No.BXN1891027), Aadhar Card (No. 946109507636), Marriage Certificate (No. 1528/2014), Transfer Certificate (No. 205/03-04), S.S.L.C Book (No. 070781), Notary attested copy of Passport (No. P1965695).
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Siju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court declares that the date of birth of the plaintiff is 31.05.1988.
Evidence:
The court decreed that the date of birth of the plaintiff shown in the passport as 31.05.1983 has to be corrected and is declared that the date of birth of the plaintiff is 31.05.1988.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant is directed to correct the date of birth in the passport.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to do the correction within a period of one month from the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the passport with incorrect date of birth which the plaintiff seeks to correct.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: PAN Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the correct date of birth of the plaintiff as 31.05.1988.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Driving License
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the claim of the plaintiff regarding his correct date of birth.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Election Identity Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document helps establish the correct date of birth of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Aadhar Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is used to support the plaintiff's claim of his correct date of birth.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Marriage Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence regarding the plaintiff's identity and date of birth.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Transfer Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further supports the correct date of birth of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: S.S.L.C Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is presented to validate the plaintiff's actual date of birth.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Notary attested copy of Passport
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is submitted to show the renewed passport which still contains the incorrect date of birth.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Correction of date of birth
Case Code
Case between Sajith Kokkanneetavida vs Passport Officer regarding declaration of date of birth.
Case Code Year
Case between Sajith Kokkanneetavida vs Passport Officer regarding declaration of date of birth.

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Reena vs Radhakrishnan. P. K et al regarding settlement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between ASHOKAN vs THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE et al regarding suit dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Balan vs Vinil Babu regarding specific performance of a promise
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nanu Arettummal vs Narayani Nellikunnummal et al regarding partition and separate possession
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI, BALAKRISHNAN vs VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won