Case Summary
HAMEED HAJI and others are plaintiffs suing VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent trespassing into their property and related acts. The case arose due to actions taken by the defendants on 18-11-2024.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction and Rs. 7725 as costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants and directed them to pay costs to the plaintiffs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found sufficient evidence supporting the plaintiffs' claims regarding property trespass.
The court found sufficient evidence supporting the plaintiffs' claims regarding property trespass.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court found sufficient evidence supporting the plaintiffs' claims regarding property trespass.
Judgment Evidence:
1)That the defendants and their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing any part of the building situated there or annexing any section of the plaint schedule property for widening of the road on the north and from committing any acts of waste in the plaint schedule property. 2)That the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 7725/-(Rupees Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Twenty Five only) to the plaintiffs being the costs of the suit.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- HAMEED HAJI
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- KUNHABDULLA
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- ABDULLA HAJI
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AKHILA MARIYAT
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C. K. NAZAR
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. T. K CHANDRAN
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
None stated
Defendants Documents
Cost list not put in
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C.Subramanyian
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Anoop
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. M. Previn
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Abdul Raoof
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Mohammed Niyas Avukkal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.M Ramdas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Akshaya. V. C
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants and their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing any part of the building situated there or annexing any section of the plaint schedule property for widening of the road on the north and from committing any acts of waste in the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
that the defendants and their men or agents be restrained by permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and from demolishing any part of the building situated there or annexing any section of the plaint schedule property for widening of the road on the north and from committing any acts of waste in the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Cost
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit to be paid by the defendants to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
that the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 7725/-(Rupees Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Twenty Five only) to the plaintiffs being the costs of the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Trespassing
Case Code
Case between HAMEED HAJI et al vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between HAMEED HAJI et al vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction