Case Summary
Ashokan M. P filed a suit against Baby Rajan and others for recovery of possession of the plaint B schedule property based on the plaintiff’s title. The cause of action arose on 23-12-2022.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Recovery of possession of plaint B schedule property and costs of Rs. 24,731.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered that the plaintiff is entitled to recover possession of the plaint B schedule property from the defendants, who are also required to pay costs amounting to Rs. 24,731.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved his title over the property.
The plaintiff proved his title over the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved his title over the property.
The plaintiff proved his title over the property.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff has established his title to the property in question.
Judgment Evidence:
This court doth order and decree. 1)That the plaintiff be entitled to recover the possession of plaint B schedule property from the defendants on the strength of the plaintiff’s title. 2)That the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 24,731/-(Rupees Twenty Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Thirty One only) to the plaintiff being the costs of the suits.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- ASHOKAN. M. P
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- BABY RAJAN
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NAVEEN RAJ M.P
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- NIDHIN RAJ. M. P
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Plaint B schedule property documents.
Defendants Documents
Cost list not put in.
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Subramanyian. C.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Anoop
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Previn. P. M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Prafullachandran Moodadi
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Pradeepan. K. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gireesh. P
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff be entitled to recover the possession of plaint B schedule property from the defendants.
Evidence:
That the plaintiff be entitled to recover the possession of plaint B schedule property from the defendants on the strength of the plaintiff’s title.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 24,731 to the plaintiff being the costs of the suits.
Evidence:
That the defendants do pay a sum of Rs. 24,731/-(Rupees Twenty Four Thousand Seven Hundred and Thirty One only) to the plaintiff being the costs of the suits.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Title deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The court considered the plaintiff's title to grant possession of the property.
Reference:
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Recovery of Possession
Case Code
Case between ASHOKAN. M. P vs BABY RAJAN et al regarding recovery of possession.
Case Code Year
Case between ASHOKAN. M. P vs BABY RAJAN et al regarding recovery of possession.