Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No 121/2024

Case between Mundiyott ABOOBACKER vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-11-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Mundiyott ABOOBACKER is the plaintiff in this civil suit. The case involved a dispute leading to the plaintiff not pressing the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as not pressed without costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mundiyott ABOOBACKER
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
AKHILA MARIYAT
Party Age
30
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. K. NAZAR
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KTK CHANDRAN
Party Age
63
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Subramanyian. C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. M. Previn
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul raoof
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Mohammed Niyas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. M. Ragunath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. M. Ramdas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Akshaya. V. C
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed without costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Mundiyott ABOOBACKER vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Mundiyott ABOOBACKER vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Reena vs Radhakrishnan. P. K et al regarding settlement of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between ASHOKAN vs THE VATTOLI NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE et al regarding suit dismissal for default
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Balan vs Vinil Babu regarding specific performance of a promise
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nanu Arettummal vs Narayani Nellikunnummal et al regarding partition and separate possession
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI, BALAKRISHNAN vs VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won