Similar Cases
Based on: EP 26/2025 — Case between Kavilumpara Vanitha Sahakarana Sangham Ltd vs Sasi et al regarding decree debt
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
EP 148/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MUTHURAJ regarding execution petition
KERALA GRAMIN BANK is the Decree Holder/Plaintiff seeking execution of a petition against MUTHURAJ, who is reported to be abroad. The petition was not executed as the Judgment Debtor was unavailable.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 95/2024
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-Operative Society Ltd. vs Ammad. K. K et al regarding judgment debtor's means.
The petitioner, Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-Operative Society Ltd., represented by its Secretary Nisha. K. V, is involved in a petition for execution of a decree. The court dismissed the execution petition for default as the decree holder was not ready to prove the means of the judgment debtor.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 126/2025
Case between NEELAM PARAMBHATH ASOKAN et al vs NEELAM PARAMBHATH CHANDRAN et al regarding Property delivery.
NEELAM PARAMBHATH ASOKAN filed a petition seeking property delivery under the Civil Procedure Code. The petition involves multiple respondents who are legal heirs.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 218/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs ABDUL SALAM regarding dismissal of execution petition.
The Kerala Gramin Bank filed a petition against Abdul Salam regarding an execution petition. The court dismissed the petition for want of steps.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 156/2025
Case between Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society vs Manojan KK et al regarding decree debt
The Kavilumpara Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society is the petitioner represented by Secretary Nisha KV, while Manojan KK and others are the respondents. The case involves the execution petition for the recovery of a decree debt.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 190/2025
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. vs Rajeesh. K et al regarding verification of decree satisfaction.
The case involves Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. petitioning for verification of decree satisfaction against Rajeesh. K and Sudheer. T. P. The matter has been settled as per the court's order.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 232/2025
Case between Sirajudheen vs Puthalath Ahammad Haji et al regarding property delivery.
Sirajudheen filed a petition for execution related to a decree concerning property delivery. The respondents, including Puthalath Ahammad Haji and Meethale Puthalath Najma, were absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 227/2025
Case between Pathu Valiyaparambath et al vs Kunhami et al regarding property delivery and satisfaction of decree.
The case involves a petition filed under civil procedure for property delivery and recording satisfaction. It includes multiple respondents and petitioners related to a deceased individual.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 87/2025
Case between Aneesh vs Prajith Kumar regarding settlement of dues.
Aneesh, represented by his Power of Attorney holder Balan, filed a petition against Prajith Kumar for the settlement of an amount under a decree. The matter has been settled with the judgment debtor paying the agreed amount.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 212/2025
Case between MOTTEMMAL SAKKEENA vs KINARULLA PARAMBATH MAMMOOTTY et al regarding property delivery.
MOTTEMMAL SAKKEENA is the petitioner in this execution petition, seeking delivery of property. The respondents are multiple parties related to the decree holder, and the court has closed the execution petition upon delivery of the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 172/2025
Case between Secretary Kakkattil Co operative Rural Bank Ltd vs Ratheesh et al regarding settlement of matter.
The case involves the Secretary of Kakkattil Co operative Rural Bank Ltd as the petitioner, and Ratheesh along with other respondents. The matter has been settled with full satisfaction recorded.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 246/2023
Case between Rohini Lease And General Finances vs Muralidharan K et al regarding payment of decree debt.
Rohini Lease And General Finances is the petitioner seeking enforcement of a decree. The respondents have agreed to pay off the decree debt in installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 200/2025
Case between BALAN vs KALLYANI et al regarding property delivery
Balan, the petitioner, filed this petition under Order XXI Rule 35 of the Civil Procedure Code. The respondents did not appear, and the court closed the execution petition after the property was delivered.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 201/2025
Case between KALLYANI vs BALAN et al regarding property delivery.
KALLYANI has filed a petition regarding the delivery of property. The court has recorded full satisfaction and closed the execution petition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 122/2025
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. et al vs Nidhin. V. N et al regarding settlement of petition
The case involves a petition by Kavilumpara Rural Employees & Workers Welfare Co-operative Society Ltd. against Nidhin. V. N and Nanu regarding matters pertaining to civil procedure. The matter has been settled between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 125/2021
Case between Alikkutty. T. P vs Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji regarding dismissal for default
The plaintiffs are Alikkutty. T. P and Asya, while the defendant is Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji. The case involves a suit filed under the Civil Procedure Code, but the plaintiffs were not ready for evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 47/2024
Case between Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji et al vs Haris et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction
The plaintiffs, led by Irumbanandiyil Aboobacker Haji, allege that the defendants trespassed on their property and caused damage. The case seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants to prevent further interference with the plaintiffs' possession.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS/1136/1953
Case between Thondarkulangara Korumbathi et al vs Thondarkulangara Chekkon et al regarding preliminary decree
This case involves the petitioners Thondarkulangara Korumbathi and others against the respondents Thondarkulangara Chekkon and others regarding a preliminary decree. The court issued its order on the date specified.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 123/2022
Case between JANU vs BAHULEYAN @ BABU regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves JANU, the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against BAHULEYAN @ BABU, the defendant, regarding trespassing and boundary destruction of the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims identity issues regarding the property need resolution before the court can proceed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 72/2025
Case between SYNDICATE BANK vs ADARSH. A. C et al regarding dismissal of suit.
The case involves SYNDICATE BANK as the plaintiff against ADARSH. A. C and others as defendants concerning a civil suit. The matter was settled, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP 392/2022
Case between Kunnamangalam Mekhala Karshika Welfare Co-operative Society Limited vs Randheer MK et al regarding settlement of decree
Kunnamangalam Mekhala Karshika Welfare Co-operative Society Limited is the petitioner represented by its secretary Shibili K. The respondents include Randheer MK, Krishnakumar K, and Chandukutty. The case is about the enforcement of a decree that has been settled.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 170/2024
Case between Secretary, Nadakkavu Co-operative Urban Society Ltd vs Jose Kuryakose et al regarding settlement of matter
The case involves a petition by the Secretary of the Nadakkavu Co-operative Urban Society Ltd against several respondents regarding a settled matter. The court recorded the full satisfaction of the decree holder.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 335/2022
Case between Health Amenities Multi purpose District Co-operative Society Limited vs Anas Ali et al regarding execution petition for arrest.
The petitioner, Health Amenities Multi purpose District Co-operative Society Limited, is seeking to execute a decree against the respondent, Anas Ali, for the payment of a decreetal amount. The court evaluated whether the respondent has the means to pay the amount owed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 362/2024
Case between Secretary , Nadakkavu Co-operative Urban Society Ltd vs Hareesh T et al regarding mediation settlement.
The case involves a petition by the Secretary of the Nadakkavu Co-operative Urban Society Ltd against Hareesh T and others. The matter was settled through mediation for a total payment of Rs.70,000 to be paid in installments.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
EP 446/2023
Case between Kunnamangalam Co-operative Rural Housing Society et al vs Sasidharan regarding satisfaction of decree
Kunnamangalam Co-operative Rural Housing Society, represented by its Secretary, filed this petition against Sasidharan for the enforcement of a decree. The parties have settled the matter, leading to a closure of the case.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 5/2024
Case between Gangadharan vs Ahammad et al regarding permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiff Gangadharan is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants for trespassing and constructing a mobile tower in proximity to his property. The defendants include Ahammad and Summit Digital Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., who are accused of disturbing the plaintiff's property boundaries.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 16/2023
Case between Asya vs C. K. Sahad regarding fixation of boundary and recovery of possession
Asya and C. K. Sahad, siblings, are involved in a dispute regarding the encroachment of property. The plaintiff, Asya, claims that the defendant has unlawfully constructed on her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 17/2025
Case between FEDERAL BANK vs RADHA. N. P et al regarding settlement of suit.
The case involves FEDERAL BANK as the plaintiff and RADHA. N. P, NANU. N. P, RASEETHA. P. B as defendants. The matter has been settled.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 26/2013
Case between Meenakshi Amma vs Kuttiyil Pocker et al regarding dismissal of suit due to abatement.
The plaintiff, Meenakshi Amma, filed a suit against defendants including Kuttiyil Pocker and others. The court found that the plaintiff had expired and no steps were taken to implead legal heirs, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 11/2016
Case between Kurunnan Veetil Usman et al vs Kurunnan Veetil Moideen et al regarding fixation and mandatory injunction.
The petitioners, Kurunnan Veetil Usman and Kurunnan Veetil Safiya, have filed a petition to implead Jameela K.V. as a supplemental defendant in a suit regarding a property dispute. The respondents oppose the petition stating it is belated.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
RPIA. No. 21/2024 in OS. No. 50/2022
Case between THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI vs KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER regarding restoration of dismissed suit
The petitioner, THERUVATH KANDI HYDER ALI, seeks to restore a suit that was dismissed for default. The respondent, KARINGANEENTAVITA SHAHEER, opposes the petition claiming lack of bonafides and absence of medical evidence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 133/2024
Case between VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU vs V. V. MUHAMMADALI et al regarding Suit dismissal
VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU is the plaintiff, and V. V. MUHAMMADALI along with several others are the defendants. The case was about a suit that was not pressed and subsequently dismissed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 91/2024
Case between RAMLA vs SUBAIR regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
The case involves RAMLA as the plaintiff and SUBAIR as the defendant. It is a petition for the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to assist in measuring property boundaries and to provide injunctions.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 100/2024
Case between SAMEERA et al vs JAMEELA et al regarding settlement of a civil dispute.
This case involves a civil dispute between the plaintiffs, led by SAMEERA, and the defendants, led by JAMEELA. The matter was settled amicably between the parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 23/2025
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JAMES. K. P regarding recovery of loan amount.
This case involves KERALA GRAMIN BANK seeking to recover an agricultural loan amount from JAMES. K. P. The defendant failed to repay the loan, leading to the plaintiff bank filing the suit for recovery.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 80/2023
Case between Vattakandiyil Kamala vs Binu et al regarding mandatory and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiffs, Vattakandiyil Kamala and Vattakandiyil Babu @ Suresh Babu, are seeking mandatory and prohibitory injunctions against the defendants for alleged encroachment and illegal construction on their property. The defendants, including Binu, claim adherence to building rules and deny any encroachment.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No. 41 /2018
Case between MEETHALE PALOLLATHIL KANNAN et al vs KUNIYIL KANNAN et al regarding partition of property
The case involves a partition application filed by the plaintiffs regarding certain properties as per a preliminary decree. The petitioners seek a final decree based on the preliminary judgment, where shares in the properties are divided among the plaintiffs and defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 40/2025
Case between P. Sunil vs Hameed et al regarding injunction
P. Sunil, the petitioner, filed an application for an ad-interim injunction against the respondents Hameed and Manesh. The court granted the injunction as there was no rent in arrears from the petitioner.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 39/2025
Case between Chandrasekharan vs Savitha et al regarding injunction
Chandrasekharan is the petitioner who filed for an ad-interim injunction against Savitha and others. The court found that a prima facie case had been established for granting the injunction.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 72/2021
Case between KANIYOTH SEENATH vs KANIYOTH ABDUL RAZAQ regarding fixation of boundary and injunction.
The plaintiff, KANIYOTH SEENATH, filed a suit against the defendant, KANIYOTH ABDUL RAZAQ, for fixing the boundary and seeking injunction against trespassing. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has encroached upon her property as per the title deed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 146/2022
Case between Girija vs Peedikayulla Parambath Indira et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Girija, the plaintiff, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Peedikayulla Parambath Indira and others to prevent them from trespassing into her property. The dispute concerns the identification and ownership of specific land boundaries that the plaintiff claims as part of her property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 162 /2023
Case between KADUKKANKANDIYIL KUNHIKANNAN vs KADUKKANKANDIYIL KUNHIKANARAN regarding partition of property
The plaintiff, KADUKKANKANDIYIL KUNHIKANNAN, is seeking partition of property against the defendant, KADUKKANKANDIYIL KUNHIKANARAN. The court has previously issued a preliminary decree and now addresses the final decree application for the partition.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 99/2023
Case between Baburaj vs Karimbil Abdulkader Haji et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
This case involves Baburaj as the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Karimbil Abdulkader Haji and Rabiya, the defendants. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants are blocking his access to his property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP No. 36/2022
Case between REEMA vs JAYASREE regarding Execution Petition
Reema filed an execution petition against Jayasree. The court ordered the closure of the execution petition after the full amount was received by the decree holder.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 10/2025
Case between Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji vs Shyni et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Ammad. K @ Ammad Haji is the plaintiff, who claims ownership of a property and seeks protection against trespass by the defendants, Shyni, Akshaya, and Arjun. The defendants did not appear in court, resulting in a default judgment in favor of the plaintiff.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 81/2024
Case between CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI, BALAKRISHNAN vs VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH et al regarding suit dismissed as not pressed.
The plaintiffs, CHORANGAD EECHALI ABU HAJI and BALAKRISHNAN, filed a suit against VALAYAM GRAMAPANCHAYATH and the Secretary of the Gramapanchayath. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 113/2024
Case between Saleena vs Ajeendran Alakandi et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Saleena is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Ajeendran Alakandi and others. The case involves allegations of trespassing and attempts to alter the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS. No. 15/2024
Case between N. K. Chandran vs Secretary, Nadapuram Gramapanchayath et al regarding IA No. 12/2025
N. K. Chandran, the plaintiff, sought relief through a petition in the Court of the Munsiff at Nadapuram. The respondents, including various government officials and contractors, were involved in the case regarding a belated petition.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won